Sterling Kymberle L, Ganz Ollie, Wackowski Olivia A, Glasser Allison M, Villanti Andrea C
Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):741-747. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae066.
Menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars (MC/FC) bring profits to U.S. tobacco companies at the cost of Black/African American (B/AA) lives. This exploratory cross-sectional study describes perceptions of tobacco company engagement and activities in B/AA communities related to MC/FC.
Among 2307 U.S. adults aged 18-45 surveyed in 2022, six items addressed beliefs about tobacco company funding of B/AA community organizations, payment of B/AA lobbyists to oppose public health policies, support of health equity efforts in B/AA communities, and targeted marketing of MC/FC in B/AA communities. Adjusted proportions were calculated for each belief overall and by race and cigarette smoking status.
Among all adults, 37% believed that tobacco companies deny the harms of MC/FCs, 20% believed they pay Black lobbyists to oppose health policies, and 12% believed they fund Black community organizations. Compared with non-B/AA adults, a higher proportion of B/AA adults believed that tobacco companies target Black communities with MC/FC marketing (62% vs. 46%). More adult smokers (ie, menthol or non-MC) than nonsmokers thought that tobacco companies support health equity efforts and did not target Black communities with MC/FC marketing nor deny the harms of MC/FCs to B/AA communities.
Few B/AAs and adult smokers believed that tobacco companies used B/AA organizations and lobbyists to oppose MC/FC policies in the B/AA community as well as reject MC/FC's harmfulness. Culturally tailored and community-engaged communication efforts are needed to correct disinformation about MC/FC tobacco companies' engagement and activities in B/AA communities among B/AA and menthol cigarette smokers.
Tobacco companies have a history of predatory marketing that promotes flavored tobacco products to Black/African American (B/AA) individuals and more recently has spread disinformation to dissuade policy support for menthol cigarette/flavored cigar (MC/FC) bans. It is unclear what are the perceptions of tobacco company engagement and activities in B/AA communities related to MC/FC. Our study shows that B/AA adults and current cigarette smokers hold misperceptions about tobacco companies' role in spreading disinformation about MC/FC. This study identified beliefs about the industry's role in funding B/AA organizations and lobbyists who oppose policy, as well as the industry's denial of menthol cigarette and flavored cigar harms as potential messaging targets for communication efforts designed to correct disinformation about MC/FC policies among B/AA and those who currently smoke MC.
薄荷醇香烟和调味雪茄(MC/FC)以黑人和非裔美国人(B/AA)的生命为代价,为美国烟草公司带来利润。这项探索性横断面研究描述了人们对烟草公司在与MC/FC相关的B/AA社区中的参与和活动的看法。
在2022年调查的2307名18至45岁的美国成年人中,有六个项目涉及对烟草公司资助B/AA社区组织、向B/AA游说者支付报酬以反对公共卫生政策、支持B/AA社区的健康公平努力以及在B/AA社区对MC/FC进行针对性营销的看法。计算了总体以及按种族和吸烟状况划分的每种看法的调整比例。
在所有成年人中,37%的人认为烟草公司否认MC/FC的危害,20%的人认为它们付钱给黑人游说者以反对健康政策,12%的人认为它们资助黑人社区组织。与非B/AA成年人相比,更高比例的B/AA成年人认为烟草公司以MC/FC营销针对黑人社区(62%对46%)。与不吸烟者相比,更多成年吸烟者(即薄荷醇吸烟者或非MC吸烟者)认为烟草公司支持健康公平努力,不以MC/FC营销针对黑人社区,也不否认MC/FC对B/AA社区的危害。
很少有B/AA人和成年吸烟者认为烟草公司利用B/AA组织和游说者在B/AA社区反对MC/FC政策以及否认MC/FC的有害性。需要开展针对文化背景且社区参与的沟通努力,以纠正B/AA人和薄荷醇香烟吸烟者中关于MC/FC烟草公司在B/AA社区的参与和活动的虚假信息。
烟草公司有掠夺性营销的历史,向黑人和非裔美国人(B/AA)推销调味烟草产品,最近还传播虚假信息以劝阻对薄荷醇香烟/调味雪茄(MC/FC)禁令的政策支持。目前尚不清楚人们对烟草公司在与MC/FC相关的B/AA社区中的参与和活动有何看法。我们的研究表明,B/AA成年人和当前吸烟者对烟草公司在传播关于MC/FC的虚假信息方面的作用存在误解。这项研究确定了关于该行业在资助反对政策的B/AA组织和游说者方面的作用的看法,以及该行业否认薄荷醇香烟和调味雪茄的危害,这些可作为旨在纠正B/AA人和当前吸食MC者中关于MC/FC政策的虚假信息的沟通努力的潜在信息目标。