Suppr超能文献

以他们自己的话:年轻人吸薄荷香烟的开始、看法、经验和监管观点。

In Their Own Words: Young Adults' Menthol Cigarette Initiation, Perceptions, Experiences and Regulation Perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Health Education and Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ.

Department of Health and Physical Education, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Aug 14;20(9):1076-1084. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx048.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Menthol cigarettes are disproportionately used by young people and have been called smoking starter products. However, limited qualitative research exists on young adults' perceptions of and experiences with these products, with much of it based on document reviews of the tobacco industry's research.

METHODS

We conducted six focus groups with young adult (ages 18-24) menthol smokers in New Jersey (half with black smokers) between December 2014 and March 2015. Participants were asked open-ended questions about their menthol smoking initiation, preference reasons, substitution behaviors, and perceptions of menthol cigarette risks and regulation.

RESULTS

Participants' menthol cigarette initiation and preference were influenced by their perceived popularity, brand recognition, taste, smoothness, satisfaction and access (including as "loosies," typically available for Newport). Some believed menthol cigarettes were less harmful than non-menthol cigarettes when initiating smoking. Many currently believed menthol cigarettes were more harmful because they contained extra "additives," were stronger (ie, requiring fewer cigarettes to feel satisfied), and/or based on hearsay. Many had tried new brand Camel Crush, which was perceived to be especially minty, fun, and attractive for newer smokers. While some used non-menthol cigarettes when menthols were unavailable, many said they would never or almost never substitute. Many acknowledged a menthol cigarettes ban would likely help them quit smoking, even though they did not support the idea.

CONCLUSIONS

Menthol cigarette initiation is influenced by an interplay of multiple factors including their sensory properties, marketing, perceived popularity and availability. The FDA should continue to pursue closing this flavored cigarette loophole.

IMPLICATIONS

In this first qualitative study of menthol cigarette use among young adults, we found further evidence that menthol cigarettes can act as starter products because they are perceived as easier to smoke and taste and smell better than non-menthol cigarettes. We also add to the literature in finding that menthol cigarettes are perceived by young people who smoke menthol cigarettes as delivering satisfaction with fewer cigarettes, being accessible as "loosies", and being popular among their peers. Many did not understand the reasons behind a potential menthol ban. Any future regulation of menthol cigarettes should include a public educational campaign to support buy-in.

摘要

背景

薄荷醇香烟在年轻人中不成比例地被使用,并且被称为吸烟入门产品。然而,关于年轻人对这些产品的看法和体验的定性研究有限,其中大部分是基于对烟草行业研究的文件审查。

方法

我们于 2014 年 12 月至 2015 年 3 月在新泽西州(一半为黑人吸烟者)进行了六组年轻成年人(18-24 岁)薄荷醇吸烟者的焦点小组。参与者被要求回答关于他们的薄荷醇吸烟起始、偏好原因、替代行为以及对薄荷醇香烟风险和监管的看法的开放式问题。

结果

参与者的薄荷醇香烟起始和偏好受到他们认为的受欢迎程度、品牌知名度、口味、口感、满意度和可获得性(包括作为“松散香烟”,通常可用于购买新港湾)的影响。一些人认为在开始吸烟时,薄荷醇香烟比非薄荷醇香烟的危害更小。许多人目前认为薄荷醇香烟更有害,因为它们含有额外的“添加剂”,更强(即,需要更少的香烟来感到满足),并且/或者基于传闻。许多人尝试过新品牌骆驼压碎,它被认为对新吸烟者来说特别有薄荷味、有趣和有吸引力。虽然有些人在薄荷醇香烟不可用时使用非薄荷醇香烟,但许多人表示他们永远或几乎永远不会替代。许多人承认薄荷醇香烟禁令可能会帮助他们戒烟,尽管他们不支持这个想法。

结论

薄荷醇香烟的起始受到多种因素的相互作用的影响,包括它们的感官特性、营销、受欢迎程度和可获得性。FDA 应继续寻求关闭这种调味香烟的漏洞。

意义

在这项关于年轻成年人薄荷醇香烟使用的首次定性研究中,我们发现了进一步的证据,证明薄荷醇香烟可以作为入门产品,因为它们被认为比非薄荷醇香烟更容易吸烟、口感和气味更好。我们还在文献中补充了这样的发现,即薄荷醇香烟被吸烟薄荷醇香烟的年轻人认为可以通过更少的香烟来获得满足感,作为“松散香烟”可获得,并且在同龄人中很受欢迎。许多人不理解潜在薄荷醇禁令背后的原因。未来对薄荷醇香烟的任何监管都应该包括一个支持支持的公共教育运动。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
The Scientific Basis for the Regulation of Flavors in Tobacco Products.烟草制品调味剂监管的科学基础。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):381-406. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-075624. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

6
Switching to E-Cigarettes in the Event of a Menthol Cigarette Ban.在薄荷醇香烟被禁的情况下转向电子烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1286-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv021. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验