Dept of Clinical Psychology, GSAPP-Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Dept of Psychoanalysis & Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Schizophr Res. 2024 May;267:473-486. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
The purpose of the present article is to consider schizophrenia-the very idea-from the perspective of phenomenological psychopathology, with special attention to the problematic nature of the diagnostic concept as well as to the prospect and challenges inherent in focusing on subjective experience. First, we address historical and philosophical topics relevant to the legitimacy of diagnostic categorization-in general and regarding "schizophrenia" in particular. William James's pragmatist approach to categorization is discussed. Then we offer a version of the well-known basic-self or ipseity-disturbance model (IDM) of schizophrenia, but in a significantly revised form (IDMrevised). The revised model better acknowledges the diverse and even seemingly contradictory nature of schizophrenic symptoms while, at the same time, interpreting these in a more unitary fashion via the key concept of hyperreflexivity-a form of exaggerated self-awareness that tends to undermine normal world-directedness and the stability of self-experience. Particular attention is paid to forms of exaggerated "self-presence" that are sometimes neglected yet imbue classically schizophrenic experiences involving subjectivism or quasi-solipsism and/or all-inclusive or ontological forms of paranoia. We focus on the distinctively paradoxical nature of schizophrenic symptomatology. In concluding we consider precursors in the work of Klaus Conrad, Kimura Bin and Henri Grivois. Finally we defend the concept of schizophrenia by considering its distinctive way of altering certain core aspects of the human condition itself.
本文旨在从现象学心理病理学的角度来探讨精神分裂症这一概念,特别关注诊断概念的问题性质以及关注主观体验所固有的前景和挑战。首先,我们将讨论与诊断分类的合法性相关的历史和哲学问题,包括一般意义上的问题,以及特别是针对“精神分裂症”的问题。我们讨论了威廉·詹姆斯(William James)的实用主义分类方法。然后,我们提出了一种著名的基本自我或同一性干扰模型(IDM)的修订版本,但形式上有了重大修改(IDMrevised)。该修订模型更好地承认了精神分裂症症状的多样性,甚至是看似矛盾的性质,同时通过关键的超反射概念(一种夸大的自我意识形式)以更统一的方式解释这些症状,这种形式倾向于破坏正常的指向世界的方向和自我体验的稳定性。特别关注有时被忽视但赋予涉及主观主义或准唯我论和/或包罗万象或本体论形式的偏执的经典精神分裂症体验的夸大“自我存在”形式。我们关注精神分裂症症状学的独特悖论性质。在结论部分,我们考虑了 Klaus Conrad、Kimura Bin 和 Henri Grivois 工作中的先驱。最后,我们通过考虑其改变人类状况本身某些核心方面的独特方式来捍卫精神分裂症的概念。