Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Radiological Sciences Unit, Diagnostic Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Clin Radiol. 2024 Jul;79(7):e957-e962. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
The comparison between chest x-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) images is commonly required in clinical practice to assess the evolution of chest pathological manifestations. Intrinsic differences between the two techniques, however, limit reader confidence in such a comparison. CT average intensity projection (AIP) reconstruction allows obtaining "synthetic" CXR (s-CXR) images, which are thought to have the potential to increase the accuracy of comparison between CXR and CT imaging. We aim at assessing the diagnostic performance of s-CXR imaging in detecting common pleuro-parenchymal abnormalities.
142 patients who underwent chest CT examination and CXR within 24 hours were enrolled. CT was the standard of reference. Both conventional CXR (c-CXR) and s-CXR images were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of consolidation, nodule/mass, linear opacities, reticular opacities, and pleural effusion by 3 readers in two separate sessions. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and their 95% confidence interval were calculated for each reader and setting and tested by McNemar test. Inter-observer agreement was tested by Cohen's K test and its 95%CI.
Overall, s-CXR sensitivity ranged 45-67% for consolidation, 12-28% for nodule/mass, 17-33% for linear opacities, 2-61% for reticular opacities, and 33-58% for pleural effusion; specificity 65-83%, 83-94%, 94-98%, 93-100% and 79-86%; accuracy 66-68%, 74-79%, 89-91%, 61-65% and 68-72%, respectively. K values ranged 0.38-0.50, 0.05-0.25, -0.05-0.11, -0.01-0.15, and 0.40-0.66 for consolidation, nodule/mass, linear opacities, reticular opacities, and pleural effusion, respectively.
S-CXR images, reconstructed with AIP technique, can be compared with conventional images in clinical practice and for educational purposes.
在临床实践中,通常需要比较胸部 X 光(CXR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,以评估胸部病理表现的演变。然而,两种技术之间的固有差异限制了读者对这种比较的信心。CT 平均强度投影(AIP)重建允许获得“合成”CXR(s-CXR)图像,这些图像被认为有可能提高 CXR 和 CT 成像之间比较的准确性。我们旨在评估 s-CXR 成像在检测常见胸膜-实质异常方面的诊断性能。
共纳入 142 例在 24 小时内接受胸部 CT 检查和 CXR 的患者。CT 为标准。由 3 位读者在两次独立的会议中回顾性地评估常规 CXR(c-CXR)和 s-CXR 图像中是否存在实变、结节/肿块、线性混浊、网状混浊和胸腔积液。计算每位读者和设置的敏感性、特异性、准确性及其 95%置信区间,并通过 McNemar 检验进行检验。通过 Cohen's K 检验及其 95%CI 检验测试观察者间一致性。
总体而言,s-CXR 的敏感性范围为实变 45-67%、结节/肿块 12-28%、线性混浊 17-33%、网状混浊 2-61%和胸腔积液 33-58%;特异性 65-83%、83-94%、94-98%、93-100%和 79-86%;准确性为 66-68%、74-79%、89-91%、61-65%和 68-72%。K 值范围为实变 0.38-0.50、结节/肿块 0.05-0.25、线性混浊-0.05-0.11、网状混浊-0.01-0.15 和胸腔积液 0.40-0.66。
使用 AIP 技术重建的 s-CXR 图像可与常规图像在临床实践和教育目的中进行比较。