Suppr超能文献

你收到了吗?影响公众对传染病基本繁殖数的理解、评估和使用的因素。

"R" you getting this? Factors contributing to the public's understanding, evaluation, and use of basic reproduction numbers for infectious diseases.

机构信息

Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg center for Cognition and Communication, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg, 5037 LE, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 May 1;24(1):1209. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18669-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We (1) examined the effects of evaluative labels and visual aids on people's understanding, evaluation, and use of the COVID-19 reproduction number (or "r-number"), (2) examined whether people's perceived susceptibility and (intended) adherence to preventive measures changed after being exposed to the r-number, and (3) explored whether these effects and changes depended on people's numeracy skills.

METHODS

In an online experiment, participants from a large Dutch representative sample (N = 1,168) received information about the COVID-19 r-number displayed on the corona dashboard of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. The r-number was either presented with or without a categorical line display (i.e., evaluative label) and with or without an icon-based tree diagram (i.e., visual aid) explaining how the number works. Regarding people's use of the statistic, we measured perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 and adherence (intention) to five preventive measures before and after exposure to the r-number. After exposure, we also measured participants' understanding, perceived usefulness, affective and cognitive evaluation, and objective numeracy.

RESULTS

About 56% of participants correctly interpreted the r-number, with highly numerate people having better understanding than less numerate people. Information about the r-number was perceived as more useful when presented with a visual aid. There were no differences across experimental conditions in people's understanding, affective, and cognitive evaluations. Finally, independent of experimental conditions, intention to adhere to preventive measures was higher after seeing the r-number, but only among highly numerate people.

CONCLUSIONS

Although evaluative labels and visual aids did not facilitate people's understanding and evaluation of the r-number, our results show that the statistic is perceived as useful and may be used to stimulate adherence to preventive measures. Policy makers and public health communicators are advised to clearly explain why they are giving these numbers to - especially - the less numerate people, but also how people could use them for behavior change to combat the spread of virus during a pandemic.

摘要

背景

我们(1)研究了评价标签和视觉辅助工具对人们理解、评估和使用 COVID-19 繁殖数(或“r 数”)的影响,(2)研究了人们在接触 r 数后对预防措施的感知易感性和(意图)依从性是否发生变化,(3)探讨了这些影响和变化是否取决于人们的计算能力。

方法

在一项在线实验中,来自荷兰大型代表性样本的参与者(N=1168)从荷兰卫生部、福利和体育部的新冠仪表盘上收到了有关 COVID-19 r 数的信息。r 数要么带有分类线显示(即评价标签),要么带有基于图标树图的解释说明(即视觉辅助工具)。关于人们对统计数据的使用,我们在接触 r 数前后测量了对 COVID-19 的感知易感性和对五种预防措施的依从性(意图)。接触 r 数后,我们还测量了参与者的理解、感知有用性、情感和认知评价以及客观的计算能力。

结果

约 56%的参与者正确解释了 r 数,高计算能力者的理解比低计算能力者更好。当呈现视觉辅助工具时,有关 r 数的信息被认为更有用。在不同的实验条件下,人们的理解、情感和认知评价没有差异。最后,独立于实验条件,接触 r 数后,高度计算能力者的预防措施的依从意图更高。

结论

尽管评价标签和视觉辅助工具并没有促进人们对 r 数的理解和评估,但我们的结果表明,该统计数据被认为是有用的,可能会被用于刺激预防措施的依从性。政策制定者和公共卫生传播者被建议明确解释他们为什么要向特别是低计算能力者提供这些数字,以及人们如何使用它们来改变行为以在大流行期间控制病毒的传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b90/11064422/25ef601a7040/12889_2024_18669_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验