The National Institute for Health and Care Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR Bristol BRC), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10931-2.
Long waiting times for elective hospital treatments are common in many countries. This study seeks to address a deficit in the literature concerning the effect of long waits on the wider consumption of healthcare resources.
We carried out a retrospective treatment-control study in a healthcare system in South West England from 15 June 2021 to 15 December 2021. We compared weekly contacts with health services of patients waiting over 18 weeks for treatment ('Treatments') and people not on a waiting list ('Controls'). Controls were matched to Treatments based on age, sex, deprivation and multimorbidity. Treatments were stratified by the clinical specialty of the awaited hospital treatment, with healthcare usage assessed over various healthcare settings. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed whether there was an increase in healthcare utilisation and bootstrap resampling was used to estimate the magnitude of any differences.
A total of 44,616 patients were waiting over 18 weeks (the constitutional target in England) for treatment during the study period. There was an increase (p < 0.0004) in healthcare utilisation for all specialties. Patients in the Cardiothoracic Surgery specialty had the largest increase, with 17.9 [interquartile-range: 4.3, 33.8] additional contacts with secondary care and 17.3 [-1.1, 34.1] additional prescriptions per year.
People waiting for treatment consume higher levels of healthcare than comparable individuals not on a waiting list. These findings are relevant for clinicians and managers in better understanding patient need and reducing harm. Results also highlight the possible 'false economy' in failing to promptly resolve long elective waits.
在许多国家,择期住院治疗的等候时间长是很常见的。本研究旨在解决文献中关于长时间等候对更广泛医疗资源消耗的影响的不足。
我们在英格兰西南部的医疗体系中进行了一项回顾性治疗对照研究,时间为 2021 年 6 月 15 日至 2021 年 12 月 15 日。我们比较了等待治疗超过 18 周的患者(“治疗组”)和不在等候名单上的患者(“对照组”)每周与卫生服务的接触情况。对照组根据年龄、性别、贫困程度和多种合并症与治疗组匹配。治疗组根据等待的医院治疗的临床专科进行分层,在各种医疗环境中评估医疗保健的使用情况。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验评估了医疗保健使用是否增加,并使用自举重采样估计任何差异的幅度。
在研究期间,共有 44616 名患者等待超过 18 周(英格兰的宪法目标)接受治疗。所有专科的医疗保健利用率都有所增加(p<0.0004)。心胸外科专业的患者增加最多,每年多接受 17.9 [四分位距:4.3,33.8]次二级保健接触和 17.3 [-1.1,34.1]次处方。
等待治疗的人比不在等候名单上的可比个体消耗更高水平的医疗保健。这些发现对于临床医生和管理人员更好地了解患者需求和减少伤害具有重要意义。结果还突出了未能及时解决长期择期等待带来的“虚假经济”问题。