Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):572-585. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241256639. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
The aim of this study is to demonstrate a practical framework that can be applied to estimate the health impact of changes in waiting times across a range of elective procedures in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. We apply this framework by modeling 2 procedures: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and total hip replacement (THR).
We built a Markov model capturing health pre- and postprocedure, including the possibility of exiting preprocedure to acute NHS care or self-funded private care. We estimate the change in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon for 10 subgroups defined by sex and Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile groups and for 7 alternative scenarios. We include 18 wk as a baseline waiting time consistent with current NHS policy. The model was populated with data from routinely collected data sets where possible (Hospital Episode Statistics, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and Office for National Statistics Mortality records), supplemented by the academic literature.
Compared with 18 wk, increasing the wait time to 36 wk resulted in a mean discounted QALY loss in the range of 0.034 to 0.043 for CABG and 0.193 to 0.291 for THR. The QALY impact of longer NHS waits was greater for those living in more deprived areas, partly as fewer patients switch to private care.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The proposed framework was applied to 2 different procedures and patient populations. If applied to an expanded group of procedures, it could provide decision makers with information to inform prioritization of waiting lists. There are a number of limitations in routine data on waiting for elective procedures, primarily the lack of information on people still waiting.
We present a modeling framework that allows for an estimation of the health impact (measured in quality-adjusted life-years) of waiting for elective procedures in the NHS in England.We apply our model to waiting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and total hip replacement (THR). Increasing the wait for THR results in a larger health loss than an equivalent increase in wait for CABG.This model could potentially be used to estimate the impact across an expanded group of procedures to inform prioritization of activities to reduce waiting times.
本研究旨在展示一种实用框架,可用于评估英格兰国民保健制度(NHS)中一系列选择性手术的等待时间变化对健康的影响。我们通过对两种手术(冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和全髋关节置换术(THR))进行建模来应用此框架。
我们构建了一个马尔可夫模型,该模型捕获了手术前后的健康状况,包括退出术前进入 NHS 急性护理或自费私人护理的可能性。我们根据性别和多项剥夺五分位数组的 10 个子组,并根据 7 种替代方案,在终生时间范围内估计 QALY(质量调整生命年)的变化。我们将 18 周作为与当前 NHS 政策一致的基线等待时间。该模型使用尽可能从常规收集的数据(医院事件统计数据,患者报告的结果措施和国家统计局死亡率记录)进行填充,并辅以学术文献。
与 18 周相比,将等待时间增加到 36 周,导致 CABG 的平均折扣 QALY 损失在 0.034 到 0.043 之间,THR 的损失在 0.193 到 0.291 之间。在较贫困地区生活的人,由于较少的患者转向私人护理, NHS 等待时间延长对 QALY 的影响更大。
讨论/结论:提出的框架适用于两种不同的程序和患者群体。如果应用于更多的程序组,它可以为决策者提供有关优先考虑等待名单的信息。在等待选择性手术的常规数据中存在一些限制,主要是缺乏有关仍在等待的人员的信息。
我们提出了一个建模框架,该框架允许估计英格兰 NHS 等待选择性手术的健康影响(以质量调整生命年来衡量)。我们将我们的模型应用于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和全髋关节置换术(THR)的等待。等待 THR 的增加导致健康损失大于等待 CABG 的等效增加。该模型可能可以用来估算一组扩展程序的影响,为减少等待时间的活动提供优先级排序。