• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业绿色创新因果解释的元分析:一个结构理论模型。

A meta-analysis of the causal interpretation of enterprise green innovation: A structural theoretical model.

作者信息

Li Fanbo, Zhang Hongfeng, Weng Linlu, Yan Haoqun

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Tsing Hua University, China.

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Apr 20;10(9):e29889. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29889. eCollection 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29889
PMID:38694071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11061688/
Abstract

The escalating environmental challenges have compelled corporations to embark on green innovation initiatives, establishing this as a pivotal strategy for attaining economic sustainability. Yet, there remains a lack of consensus within the scholarly community regarding the precursors and outcomes of green innovation. This research leverages Giddens' structuration theory and employs meta-analytical methods to elucidate the determinants and effects of corporate green innovation. Initially, the study synthesizes 288 effect sizes from 161 distinct scholarly articles, spanning from 2012 to early 2023, guided by the structuration framework. This comprehensive analysis corroborates the influence of several structuration theory antecedents on green innovation, thereby offering fresh empirical backing for the theory. Subsequently, it scrutinizes the link between green innovation and its impacts, evaluated through economic and environmental performance lenses. Furthermore, the research contrasts the meta-analytical findings across large-scale and smaller enterprises, underscoring notable disparities in the dynamics of green innovation across different organizational contexts. This inquiry not only reaffirms the theoretical constructs of structuration theory, such as spatialization, subjectification, and structuration, but also integrates these notions with quantifiable variable models. The paper posits that structuration theory could underpin a theoretical framework for dissecting the influential variables associated with green innovation, thereby fostering further academic investigation into corporate environmental innovation.

摘要

日益严峻的环境挑战迫使企业开展绿色创新举措,将其确立为实现经济可持续性的关键战略。然而,学术界对于绿色创新的前因后果仍缺乏共识。本研究利用吉登斯的结构化理论并采用元分析方法,以阐明企业绿色创新的决定因素和影响。首先,该研究在结构化框架的指导下,综合了2012年至2023年初161篇不同学术文章中的288个效应量。这一全面分析证实了结构化理论的几个前提对绿色创新的影响,从而为该理论提供了新的实证支持。随后,研究通过经济和环境绩效视角审视绿色创新与其影响之间的联系。此外,该研究对比了大型企业和小型企业的元分析结果,强调了不同组织背景下绿色创新动态的显著差异。这项探究不仅重申了结构化理论的理论构建,如空间化、主体化和结构化,还将这些概念与可量化变量模型相结合。本文认为,结构化理论可为剖析与绿色创新相关的影响变量提供理论框架,从而促进对企业环境创新的进一步学术研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/304c55a72734/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/94a7339a6005/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/7c0e39e166ee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/df17fee4a9e4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/b5cac69bd89f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/c97f6bfb01bb/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/551b2e958a74/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/91bf789f7320/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/a524b45d4dba/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/44aba72f840d/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/bac4807fd0a5/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/37c9670e17a4/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/304c55a72734/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/94a7339a6005/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/7c0e39e166ee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/df17fee4a9e4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/b5cac69bd89f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/c97f6bfb01bb/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/551b2e958a74/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/91bf789f7320/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/a524b45d4dba/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/44aba72f840d/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/bac4807fd0a5/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/37c9670e17a4/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/11061688/304c55a72734/gr12.jpg

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of the causal interpretation of enterprise green innovation: A structural theoretical model.企业绿色创新因果解释的元分析:一个结构理论模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 20;10(9):e29889. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29889. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Mechanism of Enterprise Green Innovation Behavior Considering Coevolution Theory.考虑共演理论的企业绿色创新行为机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 22;19(16):10453. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610453.
3
Corporate Social Responsibility Activities and Green Innovation Performance in Organizations: Do Managerial Environmental Concerns and Green Absorptive Capacity Matter?组织中的企业社会责任活动与绿色创新绩效:管理环境关切和绿色吸收能力重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 7;13:938682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938682. eCollection 2022.
4
Research on the Impact of Green Innovation Network Embeddedness on Corporate Environmental Responsibility.绿色创新网络嵌入对企业环境责任的影响研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043433.
5
Government environmental protection subsidies, environmental tax collection, and green innovation: evidence from listed enterprises in China.政府环境保护补贴、环境税征收与绿色创新:来自中国上市公司的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(2):4627-4641. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22538-3. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Shifting focus from end-of-pipe treatment to source control: ESG ratings' impact on corporate green innovation.从末端治理转向源头控制:ESG 评级对企业绿色创新的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120409. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120409. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
7
Does green credit policy affect corporate innovation performance?-A quasi-natural experiment based on Green Credit Guidelines.绿色信贷政策是否会影响企业创新绩效?——基于《绿色信贷指引》的准自然实验
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291764. eCollection 2023.
8
The impact of environmental regulation, Environment, Social and Government Performance, and technological innovation on enterprise resilience under a green recovery.绿色复苏背景下环境规制、环境、社会与政府绩效以及技术创新对企业恢复力的影响
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 21;9(10):e20278. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20278. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
The effect of enterprise financialization on green innovation: evidence from Chinese A-share non-financial listed enterprises.企业金融化对绿色创新的影响:来自中国 A 股非金融上市公司的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):56802-56817. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26377-8. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Does green finance stimulate green innovation of heavy-polluting enterprises? Evidence from green finance pilot zones in China.绿色金融是否能刺激重污染企业的绿色创新?来自中国绿色金融试验区的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(21):60678-60693. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26758-z. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Review on the escalating imperative of zero liquid discharge (ZLD) technology for sustainable water management and environmental resilience.关于零液体排放 (ZLD) 技术对于可持续水资源管理和环境恢复力的日益紧迫必要性的综述。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119614. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119614. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
2
Clarifying the relationship between green investment, technological innovation, financial openness, and renewable energy consumption in MINT.厘清MINT四国中绿色投资、技术创新、金融开放与可再生能源消费之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 16;9(11):e21083. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21083. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
The impact of environmental regulation, Environment, Social and Government Performance, and technological innovation on enterprise resilience under a green recovery.
绿色复苏背景下环境规制、环境、社会与政府绩效以及技术创新对企业恢复力的影响
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 21;9(10):e20278. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20278. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
The impacts of organizational green culture and corporate social responsibility on employees' responsible behaviour towards the society.组织绿色文化和企业社会责任对员工对社会负责行为的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60024-60034. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20072-w. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Does it pay to go green? The environmental innovation effect on corporate financial performance.走向绿色是否有利可图?环境创新对企业财务绩效的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 15;300:113695. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113695. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
6
How Do Proactive Environmental Strategies Affect Green Innovation? The Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations and Firm Performance.主动环境策略如何影响绿色创新?环境法规和企业绩效的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 28;18(17):9083. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179083.
7
What are the drivers and barriers for green business practice adoption for SMEs?中小企业采用绿色商业实践的驱动因素和障碍有哪些?
Environ Syst Decis. 2021;41(4):577-593. doi: 10.1007/s10669-021-09821-3. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation.评估金融发展的绿色创新和绩效:环境规制的中介关切。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(40):57386-57397. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14499-w. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
9
Innovation as recovery strategy for SMEs in emerging economies during the COVID-19 pandemic.创新作为新兴经济体中小企业在新冠疫情期间的复苏策略。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Oct;57:101396. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101396. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Smog, media attention, and corporate social responsibility-empirical evidence from Chinese polluting listed companies.雾霾、媒体关注与企业社会责任——来自中国污染上市公司的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):46116-46129. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11978-4. Epub 2021 Jan 6.