• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜治疗胰腺支架近端迁移:系统评价。

Endotherapy for the Proximal Migration of Pancreatic Stents: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

From the Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2024 Sep 1;53(8):e694-e699. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002354. Epub 2024 May 1.

DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000002354
PMID:38696448
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Proximal migration is one of the complications after pancreatic duct stenting. This study aimed to determine the incidence of proximal migration and to analyze the rescue methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was performed in MEDLINE/Embase database. The literatures included were reviewed and analyzed. Retrieval tools were classified into the following 3 classes: class A works by indirectly contacting the outer surface of the stent. Class B works by directly contacting the outer surface. Class C works by directly contacting the inner surface.

RESULTS

416 literatures were retrieved from 1983 to 2021. 15 literatures were included. The incidence of proximal migration of pancreatic stents was 4.7% (106/2246). The success rate of endotherapy was 86.6% (214/247), and the surgical conversion rate of it was 9.3%. Among the 214 cases in which the displaced stents were successfully removed under endoscopy, 49 cases (22.9%) used class A methods, 154 cases (72.0%) used class B methods, and 11 cases (5.1%) used class C methods. The overall rate of postoperative complication was 12.1%, including postprocedure pancreatitis (9.1%, 18/247), followed by bleeding (1.5%), perforation (1.0%), and biliary infection (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy is an effective method for the treatment of proximal displacement of pancreatic stents with acceptable complication rate.

摘要

目的

胰管支架置入后近端迁移是其并发症之一。本研究旨在确定近端迁移的发生率,并分析其解救方法。

材料和方法

在 MEDLINE/Embase 数据库中进行了检索。对检索到的文献进行了回顾和分析。检索工具分为以下 3 类:A 类通过间接接触支架的外表面起作用。B 类通过直接接触支架的外表面起作用。C 类通过直接接触支架的内表面起作用。

结果

从 1983 年至 2021 年共检索到 416 篇文献,纳入 15 篇文献。胰管支架近端迁移的发生率为 4.7%(106/2246)。内镜治疗的成功率为 86.6%(214/247),手术转化率为 9.3%。在 214 例经内镜成功取出移位支架的患者中,49 例(22.9%)采用 A 类方法,154 例(72.0%)采用 B 类方法,11 例(5.1%)采用 C 类方法。术后并发症总发生率为 12.1%,包括术后胰腺炎(9.1%,18/247),其次是出血(1.5%)、穿孔(1.0%)和胆道感染(0.5%)。

结论

对于胰管支架近端移位,内镜治疗是一种有效的方法,其并发症发生率可接受。

相似文献

1
Endotherapy for the Proximal Migration of Pancreatic Stents: A Systematic Review.内镜治疗胰腺支架近端迁移:系统评价。
Pancreas. 2024 Sep 1;53(8):e694-e699. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002354. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Incidence, risk factors and endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated pancreatic stents: 25 years of experience in a high-volume center - a case controlled study.近端移位胰管支架的发生率、危险因素及内镜取出术:高容量中心25年的经验——一项病例对照研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):3115-3119. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002273.
3
Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.用于胆道插管的胰管导丝置入术预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)术后胰腺炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;2016(5):CD010571. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010571.pub2.
4
Covered metal stent or multiple plastic stents for refractory pancreatic ductal strictures in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review.覆膜金属支架或多个塑料支架治疗慢性胰腺炎难治性胰管狭窄:一项系统评价
Pancreatology. 2014 Mar-Apr;14(2):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Early versus late ureteric stent removal after kidney transplantation.肾移植术后早期与晚期输尿管支架取出
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD011455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011455.pub2.
6
Self-expanding metal stents for gastroduodenal malignancies: systematic review of their clinical effectiveness.用于胃十二指肠恶性肿瘤的自膨式金属支架:对其临床疗效的系统评价
Endoscopy. 2004 Jun;36(6):543-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814434.
7
Endoscopic stenting for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜支架置入术治疗不可切除的恶性胆管梗阻:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 21;21(47):13374-85. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13374.
8
Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎预防用胰管支架:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.039.
9
Does endoscopic sphincterotomy reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after biliary stenting? A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下括约肌切开术是否降低了胆道支架置入后内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的风险?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2016 May;28(4):394-404. doi: 10.1111/den.12584. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
5-Fr vs. 3-Fr pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.5Fr 与 3Fr 胰管支架用于预防高危患者 ERCP 术后胰腺炎:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2014 Jul;46(7):573-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365701. Epub 2014 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel biopsy forceps assisted the removal of a deeply displaced pancreatic duct stent with pancreatic duct stenosis under the guidance of a peroral choledochoscope.一种新型活检钳在经口胆管镜引导下辅助取出了伴有胰管狭窄的深度移位胰管支架。
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E451-E452. doi: 10.1055/a-2590-8150. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
A case of pancreatic fistula with disruption of the inferior branch of the pancreatic duct caused by a pancreatic stent after endoscopic papillectomy.1例内镜下乳头切除术后因胰管支架导致胰管下支破裂并发胰瘘的病例。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb;18(1):169-175. doi: 10.1007/s12328-024-02067-x. Epub 2024 Nov 22.