• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行走在钢丝绳上:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征前患者的生育力保存。

Walking the tightrope: Fertility preservation among hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer syndrome Previvors.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.

Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jul;186:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 May 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.025
PMID:38696905
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fertility-related concerns cause significant anxiety among patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC). The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommend patients diagnosed with HBOC receive early referral to a reproductive endocrinologist. However, evidence about fertility trends in this patient population are limited and guidelines are scarce. The aim of this study is to compare fertility preservation among patients with HBOC to control patients undergoing fertility treatment without a diagnosis of infertility.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who presented to a single academic institution for fertility preservation in the setting of diagnosis of HBOC. In this study, HBOC patients are referred to as those who had tested positive for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or were at high-risk for HBOC based on a strong family history (defined as >3 family members diagnosed with HBOC) without a genetic mutation. HBOC patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion to a control group undergoing fertility preservation without a diagnosis of infertility or HBOC. All analysis was done using SPSS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Between August 1st, 2016 and August 1st, 2022, 81 patients presented to the study center for consultation in the setting of HBOC. Of those who presented, 48 (59.2%) ultimately underwent oocyte cryopreservation and 33 (40.7%) underwent embryo cryopreservation. Patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation due to BRCA1 status were more likely to present for fertility consultation at a younger age compared to control patients (32.6 vs. 34.7 years, p = 0.03) and were more likely to undergo oocyte cryopreservation at a younger age (32.1 vs. 34.6 years, p = 0.007). There was no difference in age at initial consultation or age at procedure for patients with BRCA2 or patients with a strong family history compared to control patients (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the mean age of patients with HBOC at presentation for consultation for embryo cryopreservation or the mean age the patient with HBOC underwent embryo cryopreservation compared to control patients (p > 0.05). Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 did not have expedited time from consultation to first cycle start (p > 0.05). After adjusting for factors including anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and age, patients considered in the HBOC group due to family history had less time between consultation and oocyte cryopreservation cycle compared to control patients. (179 vs. 317 days, p = 0.045). There was no difference in time from consultation to starting cycle for embryo cryopreservation for patients with HBOC compared to controls (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HBOC did not undergo expedited fertility treatment compared to control patients undergoing oocyte and embryo cryopreservation for non-infertility reasons. Patients diagnosed with BRCA1 had more oocytes retrieved compared to the control population which is possibly due to earlier age of presentation in the setting of recommended age of risk reducing surgery being age 35-40. When age matched, cycle outcomes did not differ between HBOC and control patients. Given the known cancer prevention benefit and recommendations for risk-reducing surgery, future studies should focus on guidelines for fertility preservation for patients with HBOC.

摘要

简介

遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征(HBOC)患者的生育相关问题会引起严重焦虑。妇科肿瘤学协会和美国生殖医学学会建议诊断为 HBOC 的患者尽早转介给生殖内分泌学家。然而,关于该患者人群的生育趋势的证据有限,且指南稀缺。本研究旨在比较 HBOC 患者与接受不孕治疗的对照患者的生育保护情况。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了在一家学术机构就诊的 81 名患者,他们在诊断为 HBOC 的情况下进行生育保护。在本研究中,HBOC 患者是指通过 BRCA1、BRCA2 检测到致病性突变或基于强烈的家族史(定义为>3 名家庭成员被诊断为 HBOC 但无基因突变)被认为具有 HBOC 高风险的患者。HBOC 患者与因非不孕或 HBOC 而接受生育保护的对照患者以 1:1 的比例进行匹配。所有分析均使用 SPSS 版本 9.4(SAS Institute,Cary,NC)进行。

结果

在 2016 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 1 日期间,81 名患者因 HBOC 就诊于研究中心进行咨询。在就诊的患者中,48 名(59.2%)最终接受了卵母细胞冷冻保存,33 名(40.7%)接受了胚胎冷冻保存。与对照患者相比,因 BRCA1 状态而接受卵母细胞冷冻保存的患者更可能在年轻年龄就诊(32.6 岁 vs. 34.7 岁,p=0.03),且更可能在年轻年龄接受卵母细胞冷冻保存(32.1 岁 vs. 34.6 岁,p=0.007)。与对照患者相比,BRCA2 患者或有强烈家族史的患者在首次就诊时的年龄或接受卵母细胞冷冻保存时的年龄均无差异(p>0.05)。HBOC 患者接受胚胎冷冻保存时的就诊年龄或接受胚胎冷冻保存的患者年龄与对照患者相比均无差异(p>0.05)。BRCA1 或 BRCA2 患者从就诊到开始第一周期的时间没有加快(p>0.05)。在调整了抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平和年龄等因素后,与对照患者相比,因家族史而被视为 HBOC 组的患者与卵母细胞冷冻保存周期之间的时间间隔更短(179 天 vs. 317 天,p=0.045)。HBOC 患者与对照患者相比,胚胎冷冻保存的起始周期时间无差异(p>0.05)。

结论

与因非不孕原因接受卵母细胞和胚胎冷冻保存的对照患者相比,HBOC 患者没有接受紧急生育治疗。与对照人群相比,诊断为 BRCA1 的患者获得了更多的卵母细胞,这可能是由于在建议的降低风险手术年龄(35-40 岁)就诊时年龄较小所致。当按年龄匹配时,HBOC 患者和对照患者的周期结局无差异。鉴于已知的癌症预防益处和降低风险手术的建议,未来的研究应侧重于制定针对 HBOC 患者的生育保护指南。

相似文献

1
Walking the tightrope: Fertility preservation among hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer syndrome Previvors.行走在钢丝绳上:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征前患者的生育力保存。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jul;186:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro.BRCA1/2 基因突变并不影响乳腺癌患者候选者的卵母细胞在体外成熟的能力。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):374-379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey358.
3
Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变对年轻乳腺癌女性卵巢储备和生育保存结局的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Mar;37(3):709-715. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01658-9. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
4
BRCA carriers have similar reproductive potential at baseline to noncarriers: comparisons in cancer and cancer-free cohorts undergoing fertility preservation.BRCA 携带者在基线时与非携带者具有相似的生殖潜能:在接受生育力保存的癌症和无癌症队列中的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2019 Feb;111(2):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
[Comparison of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and sporadic ovarian cancer in ovarian cancer BRCA mutations].[遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征与散发性卵巢癌中卵巢癌BRCA突变的比较]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 25;56(11):788-795. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210722-00395.
6
Reproductive potential and performance of fertility preservation strategies in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients.BRCA 突变型乳腺癌患者生育力保存策略的生殖潜能和性能。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):237-243. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx639.
7
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutation Analysis in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Families from the Aures Region (Eastern Algeria): First Report.阿尔及利亚东部奥雷斯地区遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中BRCA1和BRCA2基因种系突变分析:首次报告
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):715-726. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00586-4. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
COH outcomes in breast cancer patients for fertility preservation: a comparison with the expected response by age.乳腺癌患者生育力保存的控制性卵巢刺激结果:与按年龄预期反应的比较。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Dec;37(12):3069-3076. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01944-x. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Prognosis of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients with HBOC risk factors compared with sporadic breast cancer patients without HBOC risk factors.BRCA1/2 阴性乳腺癌患者伴 HBOC 风险因素与不伴 HBOC 风险因素散发性乳腺癌患者的预后比较。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 17;50(2):104-113. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz147.
10
Ovarian Stimulation in Patients With Cancer: Impact of Letrozole and BRCA Mutations on Fertility Preservation Cycle Outcomes.癌症患者的卵巢刺激:来曲唑和BRCA突变对生育力保存周期结局的影响。
Reprod Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):26-32. doi: 10.1177/1933719117728800. Epub 2017 Sep 6.