San Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, United States.
University of California San Diego, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jun;350:116914. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116914. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
The epidemic of loneliness and social isolation has been recognized as a public health crisis warranting the same prioritization as other public health issues today, such as obesity, substance use disorders, and tobacco use. Social disconnection is particularly prevalent and disabling among individuals with anxiety and depression, yet it is inadequately evaluated and addressed in most clinical psychology treatment research. Studies generally employ global measures of perceived connectedness, loneliness, or relationship satisfaction, limiting understanding about elements of one's social network that may change with treatment. This study examined changes in the degree (number of people nominated) and quality of one's social network from pre-to post-treatment using an egocentric social network approach in 59 adults (mean age = 30.8 years, range = 18 to 54) with clinically elevated anxiety or depression who were randomized to a cognitive and behavioral positive valence treatment versus waitlist. Participants (egos) named people in their lives (alters) with whom they discussed important issues or spent free time. For each alter, participants rated how close they felt, how close they thought the alter felt to them, and how frequently they communicated. Linear regressions, which included treatment group as a predictor, revealed no group differences in changes in network degree, perceived alter feelings of closeness, or communication frequency, despite prior findings from this sample indicating larger increases in perceived global connectedness in the treatment group. Unexpectedly, the control group reported a greater increase in perceived closeness to alters. Post-hoc analyses revealed this was explained by the treatment group identifying more distal social ties (e.g., extended family, colleagues, roommates) as alters following treatment - an outcome positively associated with global improvements in connectedness. This proof-of-concept study suggests egocentric social network surveys may provide unique information on treatment-related changes in social functioning. Suggestions are provided for adaptations to facilitate application of social network surveys to mental health treatment research.
孤独和社会隔离的流行已被认为是一场公共卫生危机,需要像当今其他公共卫生问题(如肥胖、药物使用障碍和吸烟)一样得到优先重视。在焦虑和抑郁患者中,社会脱节尤为普遍和严重,但在大多数临床心理学治疗研究中,这种情况都没有得到充分的评估和处理。研究通常采用感知联系、孤独感或关系满意度的整体衡量标准,限制了对治疗过程中可能发生变化的社交网络元素的理解。本研究采用自我中心社交网络方法,在 59 名临床焦虑或抑郁程度较高的成年人(平均年龄 30.8 岁,范围 18 至 54 岁)中,考察了治疗前后社交网络程度(提名人数)和质量的变化,这些参与者被随机分配到认知和行为积极治疗组或等待治疗组。参与者(自我)命名生活中的人(他人),并与他们讨论重要问题或共度闲暇时光。对于每个他人,参与者都会评估他们的亲近感、他们认为他人对他们的亲近感以及他们的交流频率。线性回归分析包括治疗组作为预测因素,但没有发现治疗组在网络程度、感知他人的亲近感或交流频率变化方面存在组间差异,尽管此前从该样本中得出的研究结果表明,治疗组在感知全球联系方面的增加更大。出乎意料的是,对照组报告说,他们对他人的亲近感增加更多。事后分析表明,这是因为治疗组在治疗后将更多的远程社交关系(例如,远亲、同事、室友)确定为他人——这种结果与整体联系感的改善呈正相关。这项概念验证研究表明,自我中心社交网络调查可能提供关于治疗相关社交功能变化的独特信息。为了便于将社交网络调查应用于心理健康治疗研究,提出了一些适应建议。