McSorley Ryan
DCT 2 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, Scotland.
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):81-82. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01010-w. Epub 2024 May 2.
This study by Laky et al. is a single-centre, double-blinded randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial, examining the effects of micronutrient supplementation in combination with non-surgical hygiene phase therapy (nsHPT) for Stage III and IV periodontal disease. The study was carried out at the Medical University of Vienna (Austria), School of Dentistry. The patients enrolled in the study were randomised to receive a commercially available multi-nutrient supplement (containing: vitamin C, vitamin E, zinc, selenium, alpha-lipoic-acid, cranberry extract, grapeseed extract, and coenzyme Q10) or a cellulose placebo to take for 2 months, alongside a course of non-surgical hygiene phase therapy. At baseline, the patients had a periodontal index screening (PSI) performed. Patients scoring >3 and meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the trial. Oral hygiene instruction and patient education was performed, followed by 1 or more sessions of nsHPT depending on the clinical assessment of each patient, and a full periodontal probing depth (PPD) chart was recorded. The patients were then randomised to receive either the multi-nutrient supplement or the placebo to take twice daily for 8 weeks. Following this 8-week period the PPD as well as bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival recession (GR) and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were measured. The randomisation was carried out by a study-independent member of staff at the centre using a computer programme.
A total of 149 patients were assessed for eligibility for this trial. Out of these patients, 83 were deemed to be unsuitable for the trial as they failed to meet the inclusion criteria, and 24 declined to participate. A total of 42 patients were then randomised to each arm of the study. The inclusion criteria included patients with Stage III and IV periodontal disease. Patients were deemed eligible if they met the following criteria: presence of 18 or more scorable teeth (excluding 3rd molars); >4 teeth with PPD of >6 mm; CAL > 5 mm, and no previous periodontal treatment in the past. Percentage bone loss at the most severe site, smoking status, and presence of diabetes and diabetic control were all taken into consideration. Patients were deemed ineligible for the trial if they were pregnant or under 18 years old. Exclusion criteria also included: recent periodontal abscess; a past or current co-morbidity which may confound the results of the study or endanger patients partaking in the study (i.e. malignancy, rheumatoid arthritis, and other severe systemic conditions); and obesity.
PPD was used as the primary variable in this study. Other measured outcomes such as GR, CAL, BOP and other measurements taken, such as papillary bleeding index (PBI) and papillary inflamed surface area (PISA), were considered as secondary outcome variables. A variety of tests were used in order to assess the collected data. The Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test and Levene test were used for the equality of variances, and ICC and 95% CI were used when comparing periodontal chartings for PPD (in mm). Chi-square or Fisher tests were used for categorical data between intervention and placebo. The baseline and reevaluation data was compared using the McNemar test. All data was analysed using statistical software. Significant data is indicated by a p value < 0.05.
The number of patients included for analysis was reduced to n = 20 for the intervention group and n = 19 for the placebo group. Patients were lost due to a variety of reasons including need for antibiotics and lost to follow-up. The authors concluded that in each arm of the trial, periodontal and hygiene parameters improved overall. The results show that the intervention group had a significantly higher reduction in PPD; however, following data analysis, these findings were found to be statistically insignificant.
The authors conclude that the addition of a multi-nutrient supplement, alongside nsHPT for patients undergoing treatment for Stage III and IV periodontal disease, showed a reduction in PPD and BOP when compared with a placebo and nsHPT.
拉基等人开展的这项研究是一项单中心、双盲随机安慰剂对照临床试验,旨在研究微量营养素补充剂联合非手术卫生阶段治疗(nsHPT)对III期和IV期牙周病的疗效。该研究在奥地利维也纳医科大学牙科学院进行。纳入研究的患者被随机分为两组,一组接受市售多种营养素补充剂(含维生素C、维生素E、锌、硒、α-硫辛酸、蔓越莓提取物、葡萄籽提取物和辅酶Q10),另一组接受纤维素安慰剂,为期2个月,同时进行一个疗程的非手术卫生阶段治疗。在基线时,对患者进行牙周指数筛查(PSI)。评分>3且符合纳入标准的患者被纳入试验。进行了口腔卫生指导和患者教育,然后根据每位患者的临床评估进行1次或多次nsHPT治疗,并记录完整的牙周探诊深度(PPD)图表。然后将患者随机分为接受多种营养素补充剂或安慰剂组,每天服用两次,持续8周。在这8周之后,测量PPD以及探诊出血(BOP)、牙龈退缩(GR)和临床附着丧失(CAL)。随机分组由该中心一名与研究无关的工作人员使用计算机程序进行。
共有149名患者接受了该试验的资格评估。在这些患者中,83名因未达到纳入标准而被认为不适合该试验,24名拒绝参与。然后共有42名患者被随机分配到研究的每个组。纳入标准包括患有III期和IV期牙周病的患者。符合以下标准的患者被认为符合条件:有18颗或更多可评分牙齿(不包括第三磨牙);>4颗牙齿的PPD>6毫米;CAL>5毫米,且过去未曾接受过牙周治疗。还考虑了最严重部位的骨丧失百分比、吸烟状况以及糖尿病的存在和糖尿病控制情况。如果患者怀孕或未满18岁,则被认为不符合该试验条件。排除标准还包括:近期牙周脓肿;过去或当前可能混淆研究结果或危及参与研究患者的合并症(即恶性肿瘤、类风湿性关节炎和其他严重全身性疾病);以及肥胖。
PPD被用作本研究的主要变量。其他测量结果,如GR、CAL、BOP以及其他测量指标,如乳头出血指数(PBI)和乳头炎症表面积(PISA),被视为次要结果变量。为了评估收集到的数据,使用了多种测试。Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验和Levene检验用于方差齐性检验,比较PPD(以毫米为单位)的牙周图表时使用ICC和95%CI。卡方检验或Fisher检验用于干预组和安慰剂组之间的分类数据。使用McNemar检验比较基线和重新评估数据。所有数据均使用统计软件进行分析。p值<0.05表示有显著数据。
干预组纳入分析的患者人数减少至n = 20,安慰剂组为n = 19。患者因各种原因失访,包括需要使用抗生素和失访。作者得出结论,在试验的每个组中,牙周和卫生参数总体上有所改善。结果表明,干预组的PPD降低幅度明显更高;然而,经过数据分析,这些发现被认为在统计学上不显著。
作者得出结论,对于接受III期和IV期牙周病治疗的患者,在nsHPT的基础上添加多种营养素补充剂,与安慰剂和nsHPT相比,PPD和BOP有所降低。