• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

命名稳定性与蠕虫物种名称的持久性。

Nomenclatural stability and the longevity of helminth species names.

作者信息

Poulin Robert, Presswell Bronwen

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Syst Parasitol. 2024 May 3;101(3):34. doi: 10.1007/s11230-024-10161-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11230-024-10161-4
PMID:38700784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11068675/
Abstract

Although most Latin binomial names of species are valid, many are eventually unaccepted when they are found to be synonyms of previously described species, or superseded by a new combination when the species they denote are moved to a different genus. What proportion of parasite species names become unaccepted over time, and how long does it take for incorrect names to become unaccepted? Here, we address these questions using a dataset comprising thousands of species names of parasitic helminths from four higher taxa (Acanthocephala, Nematoda, Cestoda, and Trematoda). Overall, among species names proposed in the past two-and-a-half centuries, nearly one-third have since been unaccepted, the most common reason being that they have been superseded by a new combination. A greater proportion of older names (proposed pre-1950) have since been unaccepted compared to names proposed more recently, however most taxonomic acts leading to species names being unaccepted (through either synonymy or reclassification) occurred in the past few decades. Overall, the average longevity of helminth species names that are currently unaccepted was 29 years; although many remained in use for over 100 years, about 50% of the total were invalidated within 20 years of first being proposed. The patterns observed were roughly the same for all four higher helminth taxa considered here. Our results provide a quantitative illustration of the self-correcting nature of parasite taxonomy, and can also help to calibrate future estimates of total parasite biodiversity.

摘要

虽然大多数物种的拉丁双名是有效的,但当它们被发现是先前描述物种的同义词,或者当它们所指的物种被转移到不同的属时被新的组合所取代时,许多最终会不被接受。随着时间的推移,寄生虫物种名称中有多大比例会不被接受,不正确的名称需要多长时间才会不被接受?在这里,我们使用一个数据集来解决这些问题,该数据集包含来自四个高级分类群(棘头虫纲、线虫纲、绦虫纲和吸虫纲)的数千种寄生蠕虫的物种名称。总体而言,在过去两个半世纪中提出的物种名称中,近三分之一后来不被接受,最常见的原因是它们被新的组合所取代。与最近提出的名称相比,更古老的名称(1950年以前提出)后来不被接受的比例更高,然而,导致物种名称不被接受(通过同义或重新分类)的大多数分类行为发生在过去几十年。总体而言,目前不被接受的蠕虫物种名称的平均寿命为29年;尽管许多名称仍使用了100多年,但总数的约50%在首次提出后的20年内就失效了。这里考虑的所有四个高级蠕虫分类群观察到的模式大致相同。我们的结果提供了寄生虫分类学自我纠正性质的定量说明,也有助于校准未来对寄生虫总生物多样性的估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/bd4604bbe556/11230_2024_10161_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/227cc03bbe93/11230_2024_10161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/0b411f6bb3c8/11230_2024_10161_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/fb92f9bd546e/11230_2024_10161_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/c4351c60b448/11230_2024_10161_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/bd4604bbe556/11230_2024_10161_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/227cc03bbe93/11230_2024_10161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/0b411f6bb3c8/11230_2024_10161_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/fb92f9bd546e/11230_2024_10161_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/c4351c60b448/11230_2024_10161_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01b/11068675/bd4604bbe556/11230_2024_10161_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nomenclatural stability and the longevity of helminth species names.命名稳定性与蠕虫物种名称的持久性。
Syst Parasitol. 2024 May 3;101(3):34. doi: 10.1007/s11230-024-10161-4.
2
Catalog to families, genera, and species of orders Actiniaria and Corallimorpharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa).海葵目和珊瑚藻目(刺胞动物门:珊瑚纲)的科、属及物种名录。
Zootaxa. 2016 Aug 1;4145(1):1-449. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4145.1.1.
3
Fauna europaea: helminths (animal parasitic).《欧洲动物志》:蠕虫(动物寄生虫)。
Biodivers Data J. 2014 Sep 17(2):e1060. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1060. eCollection 2014.
4
Taxonomic and geographic bias in the genetic study of helminth parasites.寄生虫遗传研究中的分类学和地理偏见。
Int J Parasitol. 2019 May;49(6):429-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
5
Taxonomic changes suggested by the genomic analysis of Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera).基于弄蝶科(鳞翅目)基因组分析提出的分类学变化
Insecta mundi. 2022;2022(921). Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
New records of helminth species and their hosts in Poland.波兰蠕虫物种及其宿主的新记录。
Wiad Parazytol. 2011;57(1):3-9.
7
The recent apple snails of Africa and Asia (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Ampullariidae: Afropomus, Forbesopomus, Lanistes, Pila, Saulea): a nomenclatural and type catalogue. The apple snails of the Americas: addenda and corrigenda.非洲和亚洲的淡水苹果螺(软体动物门:腹足纲:瓶螺科:非洲瓶螺属、福布斯瓶螺属、拉氏瓶螺属、梨形螺属、索氏瓶螺属):命名法与模式标本目录。美洲的淡水苹果螺:补遗与勘误。
Zootaxa. 2015 Mar 27;3940:1-92. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3940.1.1.
8
Annotated catalogue of the Tachinidae (Insecta, Diptera) of Chile.智利寄蝇科(昆虫纲,双翅目)注释目录
Zookeys. 2021 Oct 21;1064:1-200. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1064.62972. eCollection 2021.
9
Solving nomenclatural problems of genus-group names of the cuckoo-wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae): objectively invalid and unavailable names, new type-species designations, new names, a new genus and new synonymies.解决杜鹃蜂属(膜翅目,金小蜂科)属群名称的命名问题:客观上无效和不可用的名称,新的模式种指定,新名称,一个新属和新的同义名。
Zootaxa. 2023 Jun 8;5301(1):1-50. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.5301.1.1.
10
Short and sweet: an analysis of the length of parasite species names.简明扼要:寄生虫物种名称长度分析。
Syst Parasitol. 2022 Dec;99(6):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s11230-022-10058-0. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Size, spines, and primes: the drivers of collar spine numbers among echinostome trematodes.大小、棘刺与原基:棘口吸虫类吸虫颈棘数量的驱动因素
Parasitology. 2025 Jan;152(1):123-131. doi: 10.1017/S0031182025000046.

本文引用的文献

1
Naming the menagerie: creativity, culture and consequences in the formation of scientific names.命名动物园:科学名称形成中的创造力、文化和后果。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 8;290(2010):20231970. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1970. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
2
Can species naming drive scientific attention? A perspective from plant-feeding arthropods.物种命名能否引起科学界的关注?以植食性节肢动物为例。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 8;290(1992):20222187. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2187.
3
What's in a name? Taxonomic and gender biases in the etymology of new species names.
名称的含义:新物种名称的词源学中的分类学和性别偏见。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 May 11;289(1974):20212708. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2708.
4
Is parasite taxonomy really in trouble? A quantitative analysis.寄生虫分类学真的陷入困境了吗?一项定量分析。
Int J Parasitol. 2022 Jun;52(7):469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
5
The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation?第六次大灭绝:事实、虚构还是推测?
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Apr;97(2):640-663. doi: 10.1111/brv.12816. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Twenty-First Century Biological Nomenclature-The Enduring Power of Names.21世纪的生物命名法——名称的持久影响力。
Integr Comp Biol. 2018 Dec 1;58(6):1122-1131. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy060.
7
An updated look at the uneven distribution of cryptic diversity among parasitic helminths.对寄生蠕虫中隐秘多样性分布不均的最新研究。
J Helminthol. 2018 Mar;92(2):197-202. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X17000189. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
The Importance of Species Name Synonyms in Literature Searches.物种名称同义词在文献检索中的重要性。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162648. eCollection 2016.
9
Parasite Rates of Discovery, Global Species Richness and Host Specificity.寄生虫的发现率、全球物种丰富度与宿主特异性
Integr Comp Biol. 2016 Oct;56(4):588-99. doi: 10.1093/icb/icw084. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
Taxonomic Quality of Species Descriptions Varies over Time and with the Number of Authors, but Unevenly among Parasitic Taxa.物种描述的分类质量随时间和作者数量而变化,但寄生虫类群的变化不均匀。
Syst Biol. 2016 Nov;65(6):1107-1116. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw053. Epub 2016 Jun 10.