Suppr超能文献

残疾与死亡的关联:一项混合方法研究。

The association between disability and mortality: a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Missing Billion Initiative, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Population Health, International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2024 May;9(5):e306-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00054-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, 1·3 billion people have a disability and are more likely to experience poor health than the general population. However, little is known about the mortality or life expectancy gaps experienced by people with disabilities. We aimed to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between disability and mortality, compare these findings to the evidence on the association of impairment types and mortality, and model the estimated life expectancy gap experienced by people with disabilities.

METHODS

We did a mixed-methods study, which included a systematic review and meta-analysis, umbrella review, and life expectancy modelling. For the systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycINFO, and Embase for studies published in English between Jan 1, 2007, and June 7, 2023, investigating the association of mortality and disability. We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies and randomised controlled trials with a baseline assessment of disability and a longitudinal assessment of all-cause mortality or cause-specific mortality. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias. We did a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate a pooled estimate of the mortality rate ratio for people with disabilities compared with those without disabilities. We did an umbrella review of meta-analyses examining the association between different impairment types and mortality. We used life table modelling to translate the mortality rate ratio into an estimate of the life expectancy gap between people with disabilities and the general population. The systematic review and meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023433374.

FINDINGS

Our search identified 3731 articles, of which 42 studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 31 studies. Pooled estimates showed that all-cause mortality was 2·24 times (95% CI 1·84-2·72) higher in people with disabilities than among people without disabilities, although heterogeneity between the studies was high (τ=0·28, I=100%). Modelling indicated a median gap in life expectancy of 13·8 years (95% CI 13·1-14·5) by disability status. Cause-specific mortality was also higher for people with disabilities, including for cancer, COVID-19, cardiovascular disease, and suicide. The umbrella review identified nine meta-analyses, which showed consistently elevated mortality rates among people with different impairment types.

INTERPRETATION

Mortality inequities experienced by people with disabilities necessitate health system changes and efforts to address inclusion and the social determinants of health.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research, Rhodes Scholarship, Indonesia Endowment Funds for Education, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (Programme for Evidence to Inform Disability Action), and the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,有 13 亿人存在残疾,他们比一般人群更有可能经历健康状况不佳。然而,人们对残疾人士的死亡率或预期寿命差距知之甚少。我们旨在对残疾与死亡率之间的关联进行系统评价和荟萃分析,将这些发现与关于损伤类型与死亡率关联的证据进行比较,并对残疾人士所经历的预期寿命差距进行建模。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法研究,包括系统评价和荟萃分析、伞状评价和预期寿命建模。对于系统评价和荟萃分析,我们在 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 7 日期间在 MEDLINE、全球卫生、PsycINFO 和 Embase 中检索了调查死亡率和残疾之间关联的研究。我们纳入了前瞻性和回顾性队列研究以及随机对照试验,这些研究在基线评估残疾,并对全因死亡率或死因特异性死亡率进行了纵向评估。两位审查员独立评估了研究的合格性、提取了数据并评估了偏倚风险。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以计算残疾人群与非残疾人群相比的死亡率比值的汇总估计值。我们对检查不同损伤类型与死亡率之间关联的荟萃分析进行了伞状评价。我们使用寿命表建模将死亡率比值转化为残疾人群与一般人群之间预期寿命差距的估计值。系统评价和荟萃分析在 PROSPERO 中注册,CRD42023433374。

结果

我们的搜索确定了 3731 篇文章,其中 42 项研究被纳入了系统评价。荟萃分析纳入了 31 项研究。汇总估计表明,残疾人群的全因死亡率比非残疾人群高 2.24 倍(95%CI 1.84-2.72),尽管研究之间存在高度异质性(τ=0.28,I=100%)。建模表明,按残疾状况划分,预期寿命中位数差距为 13.8 年(95%CI 13.1-14.5)。残疾人群的特定死因死亡率也较高,包括癌症、COVID-19、心血管疾病和自杀。伞状评价确定了 9 项荟萃分析,这些分析表明不同损伤类型的人群死亡率一直较高。

解释

残疾人群经历的死亡率不平等需要进行卫生系统改革并努力解决包容和健康的社会决定因素问题。

资金

英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所、罗兹奖学金、印度尼西亚捐赠基金教育、英国外交、联邦和发展办公室(证据为残疾行动提供信息方案)和艺术与人文研究理事会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验