Suppr超能文献

多中心研究食管切除术后纵隔瘘的发生率和治疗(MuMeLe2)。

Multicenter study on the incidence and treatment of mediastinal leaks after esophagectomy (MuMeLe 2).

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul;28(7):1072-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of mediastinal anastomotic leaks (MALs) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy includes conservative, endoscopic, or surgical management. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVAC) is becoming a routine approach for MALs, although the outcomes have not been defined. This study aimed to describe the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of MALs in patients who underwent esophagectomy in 3 Italian high-volume centers that routinely use EVAC for MAL.

METHODS

Patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between September 2018 and March 2023 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 681 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, of whom 88 had MAL. The MAL rates for open, minimally invasive, and robotic esophagectomies were 11.5%, 13.4%, and 14.8%, respectively. Global and specific 30- and 90-day mortality rates for MAL were 0.9% and 2.1% and 6.8% and 15.9%, respectively. Nonoperative management (NOM) as the primary treatment was chosen for 62 patients. EVAC was the most common NOM (62.9%), and the most common operative management (OM) was anastomotic redo (53.8%). Diversion was the OM for 7 patients, of whom 3 patients died. Primary treatment proved successful in 40 patients. Among them, EVAC alone was successful in 35.9% of patients. Globally, endoscopic treatment, including EVAC, was successful in 79.0% of NOM and 55.7% of MALs. NOM and OM were chosen as secondary treatments for 27 and 10 patients, respectively. Secondary treatment proved successful in 21 patients.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MALs after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is approximately 13%. Endoscopic techniques have a success rate of almost 80%, with EVAC representing a significant part of this treatment process.

摘要

背景

Ivor Lewis 食管切除术(Ivor Lewis esophagectomy)后纵隔吻合口漏(mediastinal anastomotic leaks,MAL)的处理包括保守治疗、内镜治疗或手术治疗。内镜下真空引流(endoscopic vacuum therapy,EVAC)已成为 MAL 的常规治疗方法,尽管其结果尚未确定。本研究旨在描述意大利 3 个大容量中心常规使用 EVAC 治疗 MAL 患者的 MAL 发生率、治疗方法和结局,这些中心的患者接受 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术。

方法

纳入 2018 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月间接受 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的患者。

结果

共纳入 681 例 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术患者,其中 88 例发生 MAL。开放、微创和机器人食管切除术的 MAL 发生率分别为 11.5%、13.4%和 14.8%。MAL 的全球和特定的 30 天和 90 天死亡率分别为 0.9%和 2.1%、6.8%和 15.9%。62 例患者选择非手术治疗(nonoperative management,NOM)作为主要治疗方法。EVAC 是最常见的 NOM(62.9%),吻合口再修复(anastomotic redo)是最常见的手术治疗(operative management,OM)(53.8%)。7 例患者采用转流术作为 OM,其中 3 例死亡。40 例患者的初始治疗成功,其中 35.9%的患者仅通过 EVAC 治疗成功。总体而言,内镜治疗(包括 EVAC)在 NOM 中的成功率为 79.0%,在 MAL 中的成功率为 55.7%。27 例和 10 例患者分别将 NOM 和 OM 作为二线治疗选择。二线治疗的 21 例患者均成功。

结论

Ivor Lewis 食管切除术后 MAL 的发生率约为 13%。内镜技术的成功率接近 80%,其中 EVAC 是这种治疗过程的重要组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验