School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China; Research Centre of Resource and Environmental Economics & Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Centre of China, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 4):119074. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119074. Epub 2024 May 4.
China's carbon emission trading policy plays a crucial role in achieving both its "3060" dual carbon objectives and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13) on climate action. The policy's effectiveness in reducing pollution and mitigating carbon emissions holds significant importance. This paper investigated whether China's carbon emission trading policy affects pollution reduction (PM and SO) and carbon mitigation (CO) in pilot regions, using panel data from 30 provinces and municipalities in China from 2005 to 2019 and employing a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model. Furthermore, it analyzed the heterogeneity of carbon market mechanisms and regional variations. Finally, it examined the governance pathways for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation from a holistic perspective. The results indicate that: (1) China's carbon emission trading policy has reduced CO emissions by 18% and SO emissions by 36% in pilot areas, with an immediate impact on the "carbon mitigation" effect, while the "pollution reduction" effect exhibits a time lag. (2) Higher carbon trading prices lead to stronger "carbon mitigation" effect, and larger carbon market scales are associated with greater "pollution reduction" effects on PM. Governance effects on pollution reduction and carbon mitigation vary among pilot regions: Carbon markets of Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai, and Tianjin show significant governance effects in both "pollution reduction" and "carbon mitigation", whereas Guangdong's carbon market exhibits only a "pollution reduction" effect, and Hubei's carbon market demonstrates only a "carbon mitigation" effect. (3) Currently, China's carbon emission trading policy achieves pollution reduction and carbon mitigation through "process management" and "end-of-pipe treatment". This study could provide empirical insights and policy implications for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, as well as for the development of China's carbon emission trading market.
中国的碳排放交易政策对于实现“3060”双碳目标和联合国可持续发展目标 13(SDG 13)气候行动目标至关重要。该政策在减少污染和缓解碳排放方面的有效性具有重要意义。本文利用中国 2005 年至 2019 年 30 个省、直辖市的面板数据,采用多期差分法(DID)模型,考察了中国碳排放交易政策对试点地区的污染减排(PM 和 SO)和碳减排(CO)的影响,进一步分析了碳市场机制和区域差异的异质性,从整体角度考察了污染减排和碳减排的治理途径。结果表明:(1)中国的碳排放交易政策使试点地区的 CO 排放减少了 18%,SO 排放减少了 36%,对“碳减排”效果具有即时影响,而“污染减排”效果则存在滞后性。(2)碳交易价格越高,“碳减排”效果越强,碳市场规模越大,对 PM 的“污染减排”效果越大。不同试点地区的治理效果存在差异:北京、重庆、上海和天津的碳市场在“污染减排”和“碳减排”方面均表现出显著的治理效果,而广东的碳市场仅表现出“污染减排”效果,湖北的碳市场仅表现出“碳减排”效果。(3)目前,中国的碳排放交易政策通过“过程管理”和“末端治理”实现了污染减排和碳减排。本研究可为污染减排和碳减排以及中国碳排放交易市场的发展提供经验启示和政策建议。