Child Brittany, Saywell Isaac, da Silva Robyn, Collins-Praino Lyndsey, Baetu Irina
School of Psychology University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.
College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work Flinders University Adelaide Australia.
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 2;7(5):e2092. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2092. eCollection 2024 May.
As the fastest-growing neurological disorder globally, a better understanding of Parkinson's disease (PD) is needed to improve patient outcomes and reduce the increasing economic and healthcare burden associated with the disease. Whilst classified as a movement disorder, this disease is highly heterogeneous, encompassing a broad range of both motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS). Cognitive impairment, presenting as either mild cognitive impairment or PD-dementia, is one of the most prevalent and disabling NMS. To better understand heterogeneity in PD, researchers have sought to identify subtypes of individuals who share similar symptom profiles. To date, this research has predominantly focused on motor subtyping, with many studies comparing these motor subtypes on non-motor outcomes, such as cognitive impairment. However, despite evidence of a motor-cognitive relationship in healthy aging, findings regarding the presence of a motor-cognitive relationship in PD are inconsistent. In our proposed systematic review, we will investigate motor subtyping studies that have evaluated the relationship between motor and cognitive function in PD. We aim to examine what is currently known about the relationship between motor and cognitive impairment in PD and evaluate the state of the field with respect to the subtyping methods and quality of cognitive assessment tools used.
Systematic literature searches will be conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Results will be synthesized using meta-analysis and, where meta-analysis is not feasible, narrative synthesis.
Despite the preponderance of motor subtyping research in PD, our study will be the first to systematically review evidence regarding the association between motor subtypes and cognitive impairment. Understanding the nature of the motor-cognitive relationship in PD may lead to important insights regarding shared underlying disease pathology, which would have significant implications for early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cognitive impairment in PD.
作为全球增长最快的神经系统疾病,需要更好地了解帕金森病(PD),以改善患者预后,并减轻与该疾病相关的日益增加的经济和医疗负担。虽然该疾病被归类为运动障碍,但具有高度异质性,涵盖广泛的运动和非运动症状(NMS)。认知障碍表现为轻度认知障碍或帕金森病痴呆,是最常见且致残的非运动症状之一。为了更好地理解帕金森病的异质性,研究人员试图识别具有相似症状特征的个体亚型。迄今为止,这项研究主要集中在运动亚型分类上,许多研究在非运动结局(如认知障碍)方面比较这些运动亚型。然而,尽管在健康老龄化中有运动 - 认知关系的证据,但关于帕金森病中运动 - 认知关系的存在的研究结果并不一致。在我们拟进行的系统评价中,我们将调查评估帕金森病运动与认知功能之间关系的运动亚型分类研究。我们旨在研究目前关于帕金森病运动和认知障碍之间关系的已知情况,并评估该领域在所用亚型分类方法和认知评估工具质量方面的现状。
将在PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science中进行系统的文献检索。
将使用荟萃分析进行结果综合,如果荟萃分析不可行,则进行叙述性综合。
尽管帕金森病运动亚型分类研究占主导地位,但我们的研究将首次系统评价关于运动亚型与认知障碍之间关联的证据。了解帕金森病运动 - 认知关系的本质可能会对共同的潜在疾病病理学产生重要见解,这将对帕金森病认知障碍的早期诊断、预后和治疗产生重大影响。