Amanzadeh Jajin Elnaz, Oraee Yazdani Saeed, Zali Alireza, Esmaeili Abolghasem
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Oncol Rev. 2024 Apr 19;18:1374513. doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1374513. eCollection 2024.
Malignant gliomas are known with poor prognosis and low rate of survival among brain tumors. Resection surgery is followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in treatment of gliomas which is known as the conventional treatment. However, this treatment method results in low survival rate. Vaccination has been suggested as a type of immunotherapy to increase survival rate of glioma patients. Different types of vaccines have been developed that are mainly classified in two groups including peptide vaccines and cell-based vaccines. However, there are still conflicts about which type of vaccines is more efficient for malignant glioma treatment.
Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ clinical trials which compared the efficacy and safety of various vaccines with conventional treatments were searched in databases through November 2022. Overall survival (OS) rate, progression free survival (PFS), and OS duration were used for calculation of pooled risk ratio (RR). In addition, fatigue, headache, nausea, diarrhea, and flu-like syndrome were used for evaluating the safety of vaccines therapy in glioma patients.
A total of twelve articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Comparison of OS rate between vaccinated groups and control groups who underwent only conventional treatments showed a significant increase in OS rate in vaccinated patients (I = 0%, RR = 11.17, 95% CI: 2.460-50.225). PFS rate was better in vaccinated glioma patients (I = 83%, RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.63-5.03). Assessment of safety demonstrated that skin reaction (I = 0.0%, RR = 3.654; 95% CI: 1.711-7.801, -value = 0.0058) and flu-like syndrome were significantly more frequent adverse effects win vaccinated groups compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis also showed that vaccination leads to better OS duration in recurrent gliomas than primary gliomas, and in LGG than HGG (-value = 0). On the other hand, personalized vaccines showed better OS duration than non-personalized vaccines (-value = 0).
Vaccination is a type of immunotherapy which shows promising efficacy in treatment of malignant glioma patients in terms of OS, PFS and duration of survival. In addition, AFTV, peptide, and dendritic cell-based vaccines are among the most efficient vaccines for gliomas. Personalized vaccines also showed considerable efficacy for glioma treatments.
恶性胶质瘤在脑肿瘤中预后较差,生存率较低。胶质瘤的治疗采用手术切除后进行化疗和放疗,这是传统的治疗方法。然而,这种治疗方法导致生存率较低。疫苗接种已被建议作为一种免疫疗法来提高胶质瘤患者的生存率。已经开发出不同类型的疫苗,主要分为两类,包括肽疫苗和基于细胞的疫苗。然而,关于哪种类型的疫苗对恶性胶质瘤治疗更有效仍存在争议。
通过检索截至2022年11月的数据库,查找比较各种疫苗与传统治疗方法的疗效和安全性的Ⅰ/Ⅱ期临床试验。总生存率(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和OS持续时间用于计算合并风险比(RR)。此外,疲劳、头痛、恶心、腹泻和流感样综合征用于评估疫苗治疗胶质瘤患者的安全性。
本荟萃分析共纳入12篇文章。接种疫苗组与仅接受传统治疗的对照组的OS率比较显示,接种疫苗患者的OS率显著提高(I=0%,RR=11.17,95%CI:2.460-50.225)。接种疫苗的胶质瘤患者的PFS率更好(I=83%,RR=2.87,95%CI:1.63-5.03)。安全性评估表明,与对照组相比,接种疫苗组的皮肤反应(I=0.0%,RR=3.654;95%CI:1.711-7.801,P值=0.0058)和流感样综合征是明显更频繁的不良反应。亚组分析还显示,与原发性胶质瘤相比,复发性胶质瘤接种疫苗后的OS持续时间更长,低级别胶质瘤(LGG)比高级别胶质瘤(HGG)更长(P值=0)。另一方面,个性化疫苗的OS持续时间比非个性化疫苗更长(P值=0)。
疫苗接种是一种免疫疗法,在OS、PFS和生存持续时间方面对恶性胶质瘤患者的治疗显示出有前景的疗效。此外,自体肿瘤细胞疫苗(AFTV)、肽疫苗和基于树突状细胞的疫苗是治疗胶质瘤最有效的疫苗之一。个性化疫苗对胶质瘤治疗也显示出相当大的疗效。