Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine.
Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine; Maoming Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine;
J Vis Exp. 2024 Apr 19(206). doi: 10.3791/65969.
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill (ANP) as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of viral encephalitis. Seven databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP and WanFang) were included for literature retrieval from inception to July 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing ANP plus conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone were eligible. Pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for evaluating efficacy and safety. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessments were performed for analyzing the inconclusiveness of findings. 13 studies involving 1045 cases were included for meta-analysis. Adjuvant treatment with ANP increased the probability of the total effective rate by 17% compared with conventional treatment (Risk ratios (RR) = 1.17, 95%CI [1.08, 1.27]). The disappearance time of clinical syndromes and signs was significantly decreased after adjuvant treatment with ANP, including the time of defervescence (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1.59, 95%CI [-2.09, -1.09]), the time of consciousness recovery (WMD = -1.79, 95%CI [-2.06, -1.51]), the time of headache disappearance (WMD = -1.51, 95%CI [-1.93, -1.08]), the time of tic disappearance (WMD = -1.88, 95%CI [-2.39, -1.36]). The adjuvant efficacy of ANP for treating viral encephalitis (VE) appears to improve the total effective rate and shorten the disappearance time of clinical syndromes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to support our findings.
本荟萃分析旨在评估安宫牛黄丸(ANP)作为辅助治疗病毒性脑炎的疗效。从建库到 2023 年 7 月,我们纳入了 7 个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、SinoMed、CNKI、VIP 和万方)进行文献检索。纳入比较 ANP 联合常规治疗与单纯常规治疗的随机对照试验。计算合并效应大小和 95%置信区间(CI)来评估疗效和安全性。进行敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估,以分析研究结果的不确定性。纳入 13 项研究,共 1045 例患者进行荟萃分析。与常规治疗相比,辅助治疗 ANP 可使总有效率提高 17%(风险比(RR)=1.17,95%CI [1.08,1.27])。辅助治疗 ANP 后,临床症状和体征的消失时间明显缩短,包括退热时间(加权均数差(WMD)=-1.59,95%CI [-2.09,-1.09])、意识恢复时间(WMD=-1.79,95%CI [-2.06,-1.51])、头痛消失时间(WMD=-1.51,95%CI [-1.93,-1.08])、抽搐消失时间(WMD=-1.88,95%CI [-2.39,-1.36])。ANP 辅助治疗病毒性脑炎(VE)的疗效似乎提高了总有效率,缩短了临床症状的消失时间。需要更多高质量的随机对照试验(RCT)来支持我们的研究结果。