BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
BC Cancer-Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(5):101789. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101789. Epub 2024 May 5.
Age-related differences in the safety profile of cemiplimab for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) have not been well described. We investigated the association of increasing age with immune related adverse events (irAE) from cemiplimab, efficacy outcomes, and the prognostic significance of pre-treatment blood biomarkers in contemporary practice.
Patients starting first-line cemiplimab for locally advanced or metastatic cSCC at British Columbia Cancer between April 2019 and January 2023 were identified. Landmark four-month logistic regression analysis compared the odds of developing irAE or sequelae amongst patients aged <75 years to those aged 75-84 or ≥ 85. Objective responses were determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Univariable Cox proportional hazard (PH) regression modelling of factors associated with overall survival (OS) was performed.
Of 106 patients, the proportions aged <75, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years were 34%, 45%, and 21%, respectively. Overall, the proportion of patients with irAE ≥ grade 3, cemiplimab discontinuation, and hospitalization for immune toxicity was 27.4%, 31.1%, and 11.3%, respectively. There was no clear association between age and the odds of high grade irAE. However, increased odds of cemiplimab discontinuation was observed in patients aged 75-84 years (p = 0.05). Patients ≥85 years had increased hospitalizations due to irAE (OR = 5.00, 95% CI = 0.97-37.52) with two treatment-related deaths. Objective responses were similar across age cohorts (50.0%, 60.4%, and 54.5%) but progressive disease was higher in the age ≥ 85 group (22.2%, 18.8%, and 31.8%). On Cox PH regression analysis, age ≥ 85 years (vs. <75), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-3 (vs. 0-1), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥7.80 (vs. <7.80) were associated with shorter survival.
While the odds of high grade irAE were similar across age groups, significant age-related differences in treatment discontinuation and hospitalization due to immune toxicity were observed. Despite a higher incidence of primary progression and shorter OS in the oldest cohort, cemiplimab yielded robust objective responses regardless of age. Higher pre-treatment NLR was associated with shorter survival and the cut-point identified requires further study.
年龄相关的西妥昔单抗治疗局部晚期或转移性皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)患者的安全性特征尚未得到充分描述。我们研究了年龄增长与西妥昔单抗免疫相关不良事件(irAE)、疗效结局以及在当代实践中治疗前血液生物标志物的预后意义之间的关联。
在不列颠哥伦比亚癌症中心,我们从 2019 年 4 月至 2023 年 1 月开始使用西妥昔单抗治疗局部晚期或转移性 cSCC 的患者中确定了年龄<75 岁、75-84 岁和≥85 岁的患者。采用四个月的 landmark 逻辑回归分析比较了<75 岁、75-84 岁和≥85 岁患者发生 irAE 或后遗症的几率。使用实体瘤反应评价标准 1.1 确定客观缓解。采用单变量 Cox 比例风险(PH)回归模型对与总生存(OS)相关的因素进行分析。
在 106 例患者中,年龄<75 岁、75-84 岁和≥85 岁的患者比例分别为 34%、45%和 21%。总体而言,irAE≥3 级、西妥昔单抗停药和因免疫毒性住院的患者比例分别为 27.4%、31.1%和 11.3%。年龄与发生高级别 irAE 的几率之间没有明确的关联。然而,在 75-84 岁的患者中,西妥昔单抗停药的几率更高(p=0.05)。≥85 岁的患者因 irAE 住院的几率更高(OR=5.00,95%CI=0.97-37.52),并有两例与治疗相关的死亡。各年龄组的客观缓解率相似(50.0%、60.4%和 54.5%),但≥85 岁组的疾病进展率更高(22.2%、18.8%和 31.8%)。在 Cox PH 回归分析中,年龄≥85 岁(与<75 岁相比)、东部肿瘤协作组体力状态 2-3(与 0-1 相比)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)≥7.80(与<7.80 相比)与较短的生存时间相关。
尽管各年龄组发生高级别 irAE 的几率相似,但在因免疫毒性而停药和住院方面存在显著的年龄相关差异。尽管最年长组的原发性进展发生率更高且 OS 更短,但西妥昔单抗仍能产生强大的客观缓解,与年龄无关。较高的治疗前 NLR 与较短的生存时间相关,该切点需要进一步研究。