• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《改良的共济失调评定和评估量表(f-SARA)在脊髓小脑性共济失调中的内容效度》。

Content Validity of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) Instrument in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.

机构信息

Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc, New Haven, CT, USA.

COA Science, Parexel International, London, UK.

出版信息

Cerebellum. 2024 Oct;23(5):2012-2027. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01700-2. Epub 2024 May 7.

DOI:10.1007/s12311-024-01700-2
PMID:38713312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11489265/
Abstract

The functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) assesses Gait, Stance, Sitting, and Speech. It was developed as a potentially clinically meaningful measure of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) progression for clinical trial use. Here, we evaluated content validity of the f-SARA. Qualitative interviews were conducted among individuals with SCA1 (n = 1) and SCA3 (n = 6) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with SCA expertise (USA, n = 5; Europe, n = 3). Interviews evaluated symptoms and signs of SCA and relevance of f-SARA concepts for SCA. HCP cognitive debriefing was conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by ATLAS.TI software. Individuals with SCA1 and 3 reported 85 symptoms, signs, and impacts of SCA. All indicated difficulties with walking, stance, balance, speech, fatigue, emotions, and work. All individuals with SCA1 and 3 considered Gait, Stance, and Speech relevant f-SARA concepts; 3 considered Sitting relevant (42.9%). All HCPs considered Gait and Speech relevant; 5 (62.5%) indicated Stance was relevant. Sitting was considered a late-stage disease indicator. Most HCPs suggested inclusion of appendicular items would enhance clinical relevance. Cognitive debriefing supported clarity and comprehension of f-SARA. Maintaining current abilities on f-SARA items for 1 year was considered meaningful for most individuals with SCA1 and 3. All HCPs considered meaningful changes as stability in f-SARA score over 1-2 years, 1-2-point change in total f-SARA score, and deviation from natural history. These results support content validity of f-SARA for assessing SCA disease progression in clinical trials.

摘要

功能性共济失调评定量表(f-SARA)评估步态、站位、坐姿和言语。它是作为一种潜在的有临床意义的脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)进展的衡量标准而开发的,用于临床试验。在这里,我们评估了 f-SARA 的内容效度。在 SCA1(n=1)和 SCA3(n=6)患者以及具有 SCA 专业知识的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)(美国,n=5;欧洲,n=3)中进行了定性访谈。访谈评估了 SCA 的症状和体征以及 f-SARA 概念对 SCA 的相关性。对 HCP 进行认知性内容审核。对访谈进行了记录、转录、编码和 ATLAS.TI 软件分析。SCA1 和 3 的患者报告了 85 种 SCA 的症状、体征和影响。所有人都表示行走、站立、平衡、言语、疲劳、情绪和工作困难。所有 SCA1 和 3 的患者均认为步态、站位和言语是 f-SARA 的相关概念;3 人认为坐姿(42.9%)是相关的。所有 HCP 均认为步态和言语是相关的;5 人(62.5%)表示站位也是相关的。坐姿被认为是疾病晚期的指标。大多数 HCP 建议纳入肢体项目将增强临床相关性。认知性内容审核支持了 f-SARA 的清晰性和可理解性。对于大多数 SCA1 和 3 的患者来说,在 f-SARA 项目上保持 1 年的现有能力被认为是有意义的。所有 HCP 都认为有意义的变化是 f-SARA 评分在 1-2 年内保持稳定,总 f-SARA 评分变化 1-2 分,以及偏离自然病程。这些结果支持了 f-SARA 在临床试验中评估 SCA 疾病进展的内容效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ae/11489265/4d02aaa8077b/12311_2024_1700_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ae/11489265/aca99cc5c203/12311_2024_1700_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ae/11489265/4d02aaa8077b/12311_2024_1700_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ae/11489265/aca99cc5c203/12311_2024_1700_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ae/11489265/4d02aaa8077b/12311_2024_1700_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Content Validity of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) Instrument in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.《改良的共济失调评定和评估量表(f-SARA)在脊髓小脑性共济失调中的内容效度》。
Cerebellum. 2024 Oct;23(5):2012-2027. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01700-2. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Psychometric Validation of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia.《用于评估和评定小脑性共济失调患者的改良功能性共济失调评定量表(f-SARA)的心理计量学验证》。
Cerebellum. 2024 Oct;23(5):2095-2108. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01707-9. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
SARA captures disparate progression and responsiveness in spinocerebellar ataxias.SARA 捕获了脊髓小脑共济失调中的不同进展和反应。
J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):3743-3753. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12475-1. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
4
Long-term disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: a longitudinal cohort study.脊髓小脑性共济失调 1、2、3、6 型的长期疾病进展:一项纵向队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Nov;14(11):1101-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00202-1. Epub 2015 Sep 13.
5
Development and Validation of SCACOMS, a Composite Scale for Assessing Disease Progression and Treatment Effects in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.SCACOMS 的制定与验证,用于评估脊髓小脑共济失调疾病进展和治疗效果的综合量表。
Cerebellum. 2024 Oct;23(5):2028-2041. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01697-8. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Digital Measures of Postural Sway Quantify Balance Deficits in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.数字姿势摆动测量法可量化脊髓小脑共济失调的平衡缺陷。
Mov Disord. 2024 Apr;39(4):663-673. doi: 10.1002/mds.29742. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
7
Biological and clinical characteristics of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 in the longitudinal RISCA study: analysis of baseline data.在 RISCA 纵向研究中,脊髓小脑共济失调 1、2、3 和 6 型风险个体的生物学和临床特征:基线数据分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jul;12(7):650-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70104-2. Epub 2013 May 22.
8
Conversion of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 to manifest ataxia (RISCA): a longitudinal cohort study.将脊髓小脑共济失调 1、2、3、6 型的风险个体转化为显性共济失调(RISCA):一项纵向队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Sep;19(9):738-747. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30235-0.
9
Friedreich and dominant ataxias: quantitative differences in cerebellar dysfunction measurements.弗里德里希共济失调和显性共济失调:小脑功能测量的定量差异。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;89(6):559-565. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316964. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: disease severity and nonataxia symptoms.脊髓小脑共济失调1型、2型、3型和6型:疾病严重程度及非共济失调症状
Neurology. 2008 Sep 23;71(13):982-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325057.33666.72. Epub 2008 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Content Validity of the Spinocerebellar Ataxia Composite Score as a Measure of Disease Progression in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia.脊髓小脑共济失调综合评分作为脊髓小脑共济失调患者疾病进展指标的内容效度
Cerebellum. 2025 Sep 1;24(5):146. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01896-x.
2
Comparing randomized trial designs to estimate treatment effect in rare diseases with longitudinal models: a simulation study showcased by Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias using the SARA score.使用纵向模型比较随机试验设计以估计罕见疾病的治疗效果:一项以常染色体隐性遗传性小脑共济失调为例、采用SARA评分的模拟研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02626-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Spinocerebellar ataxia 27B: A novel, frequent and potentially treatable ataxia.脊髓小脑共济失调27B型:一种新型、常见且可能可治疗的共济失调。
Clin Transl Med. 2024 Jan;14(1):e1504. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1504.
2
As Frequent as Polyglutamine Spinocerebellar Ataxias: SCA27B in a Large German Autosomal Dominant Ataxia Cohort.与多聚谷氨酰胺脊髓小脑共济失调一样常见:德国一个大型常染色体显性共济失调队列中的SCA27B
Mov Disord. 2023 Aug;38(8):1557-1558. doi: 10.1002/mds.29559. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
Responsiveness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia and Natural History in 884 Recessive and Early Onset Ataxia Patients.
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a live e-version.
共济失调评估与分级量表:电子实时版。
J Neurol. 2025 Apr 10;272(5):332. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13071-7.
4
Validation of the Italian Version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.意大利版共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)在多发性硬化症中的效度验证:一项横断面研究。
Cerebellum. 2025 Mar 19;24(3):66. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01813-2.
5
Eye Tracking during Passage Reading Supports Precise Oculomotor Assessment in Ataxias.篇章阅读过程中的眼动追踪有助于对视神经共济失调进行精确的动眼神经评估。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 17:2025.01.13.25320487. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.13.25320487.
6
Content Validity of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia.脊髓小脑共济失调患者中Friedreich共济失调评定量表的内容效度
Neurol Ther. 2025 Apr;14(2):547-563. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00704-8. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
7
Psychometric Validation of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia.《用于评估和评定小脑性共济失调患者的改良功能性共济失调评定量表(f-SARA)的心理计量学验证》。
Cerebellum. 2024 Oct;23(5):2095-2108. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01707-9. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
《884 例隐性和早发性共济失调患者的共济失调评估和评定量表的反应性及自然病史》。
Ann Neurol. 2023 Sep;94(3):470-485. doi: 10.1002/ana.26712. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
GAA-FGF14 ataxia (SCA27B): phenotypic profile, natural history progression and 4-aminopyridine treatment response.GAA-FGF14 共济失调(SCA27B):表型谱、自然病史进展和 4-氨基吡啶治疗反应。
Brain. 2023 Oct 3;146(10):4144-4157. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad157.
5
Deep Intronic GAA Repeat Expansion in Late-Onset Cerebellar Ataxia.迟发性小脑共济失调中的深度内含子 GAA 重复扩展。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):128-141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207406. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Ataxia Rating Scales Reflect Patient Experience: an Examination of the Relationship Between Clinician Assessments of Cerebellar Ataxia and Patient-Reported Outcomes.**中文译文**: 共济失调评定量表反映患者体验:对小脑性共济失调临床评估与患者报告结局之间关系的考察。
Cerebellum. 2023 Dec;22(6):1257-1273. doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01494-1. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
7
Temporal Dynamics of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.脊髓小脑共济失调评定量表的时间动态评估。
Mov Disord. 2023 Jan;38(1):35-44. doi: 10.1002/mds.29255. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
8
Differential Temporal Dynamics of Axial and Appendicular Ataxia in SCA3.SCA3 中轴性和肢体性共济失调的差异时间动态。
Mov Disord. 2022 Sep;37(9):1850-1860. doi: 10.1002/mds.29135. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
Safety and efficacy of riluzole in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 in France (ATRIL): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.在法国(ATRIL)进行的利鲁唑治疗脊髓小脑共济失调 2 型的安全性和疗效:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Mar;21(3):225-233. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00457-9. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
10
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of spinocerebellar ataxia: A systematic review.脊髓小脑共济失调的药物和非药物管理:一项系统评价。
J Neurol. 2022 May;269(5):2315-2337. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10874-2. Epub 2021 Nov 6.