Suppr超能文献

冰XIX的构型熵及其同位素效应。

Configurational entropy of ice XIX and its isotope effect.

作者信息

Gasser Tobias M, Thoeny Alexander V, Fortes A Dominic, Loerting Thomas

机构信息

Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

ISIS Neutron and Muon Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Chilton, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 May 7;14(1):10517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61250-9.

Abstract

Ice XIX is a partly hydrogen-ordered polymorph related to disordered ice VI, similar to ice XV. We here investigate the order-order-disorder sequence ice XIX→ice XV→ice VI based on calorimetry at ambient pressure both for DO and HO-ice XIX. From these data we extract configurational entropy differences between ice XIX, ice XV and ice VI. This task is complex because, unlike for all other ices, the order-disorder transition from ice XIX to ice VI takes place in two steps via ice XV. Even more challenging, these two steps take place in an overlapping manner, so that careful separation of slow kinetics is necessary. This is evidenced best by changing the heating rate in calorimetry experiments: For fast heating experiments the second step, disordering of ice XV, is suppressed because the first step, formation of ice XV from ice XIX, is too slow. The transient state ice VI that is initially produced upon ice XIX decay then does not have enough time to convert to ice XV, but remains disordered all along. In order to tackle the challenge to determine the entropy difference between ice XIX and VI as well as the entropy difference between ice XV and VI we employ two different approaches that allow assessing the impact of kinetics on the entropy change. "Single peak integration" defines a kinetically limited result, but "combined peak integration" allows estimation of the true thermodynamic values. Our best estimate for the true value shows ice XIX to be much more ordered than ice XV (25 ± 3% vs 9 ± 4% of the Pauling entropy). For DOice XIX samples we obtain 28% of order, but only when a small number of fast H-isotope defects are used. In the second part we use these results to estimate the location of the ice XIX phase boundary both for protiated and deuterated ice XIX. The initial Clapeyron slope at ambient pressure is determined from the combination of neutron powder diffraction volume differences and calorimetry entropy differences data to be 21 K GPa with an order-disorder transition temperature T(0.0 GPa) = 103 ± 1 K. An in situ bracketing experiment at 1.8 GPa yields T(1.8 GPa) = 116 ± 3 K, i.e., the phase boundary slope flattens at higher pressures. These data allow us to determine the region of thermodynamic stability of ice XIX in the phase diagram and to explain the surprising isotope shift reversal at 1.6 GPa compared to 0.0 GPa, i.e., why DO-ice XIX disorders at lower temperatures than HO-ice XIX at 1.6 GPa, but at higher temperatures at ambient pressures.

摘要

冰十九是一种部分氢有序的多晶型物,与无序的冰六相关,类似于冰十五。我们在此基于常压下的量热法研究了冰十九→冰十五→冰六的有序-有序-无序序列,研究对象包括氘代冰十九和重水冰十九。从这些数据中,我们提取了冰十九、冰十五和冰六之间的构型熵差。这项任务很复杂,因为与所有其他冰不同,从冰十九到冰六的有序-无序转变通过冰十五分两步进行。更具挑战性的是,这两步以重叠的方式发生,因此需要仔细分离缓慢的动力学过程。这在量热实验中改变加热速率时得到了最好的证明:对于快速加热实验,第二步,即冰十五的无序化被抑制,因为第一步,从冰十九形成冰十五,太慢了。冰十九衰变时最初产生的瞬态冰六没有足够的时间转化为冰十五,而是一直保持无序状态。为了应对确定冰十九和冰六之间的熵差以及冰十五和冰六之间的熵差这一挑战,我们采用了两种不同的方法,这两种方法可以评估动力学对熵变的影响。“单峰积分”定义了一个受动力学限制的结果,但“组合峰积分”可以估计真实的热力学值。我们对真实值的最佳估计表明,冰十九比冰十五有序得多(相对于鲍林熵,分别为25±3%和9±4%)。对于氘代冰十九样品,我们得到28%的有序度,但这仅在使用少量快速氢同位素缺陷时成立。在第二部分中,我们利用这些结果估计了质子化和氘代冰十九的冰十九相界位置。常压下的初始克拉佩龙斜率由中子粉末衍射体积差和量热熵差数据组合确定为21 K/GPa,有序-无序转变温度T(0.0 GPa)=103±1 K。在1.8 GPa下进行的原位包围实验得到T(1.8 GPa)=116±3 K,即相界斜率在更高压力下变平。这些数据使我们能够确定相图中冰十九的热力学稳定区域,并解释与0.0 GPa相比在1.6 GPa时令人惊讶的同位素位移反转,即为什么在1.6 GPa时氘代冰十九比重水冰十九在更低温度下无序,但在常压下在更高温度下无序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5f/11076531/bdd6d6906797/41598_2024_61250_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验