• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

60 岁以下主动脉瓣置换术患者 20 年的随访经验。

Twenty-year experience following aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 7;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02776-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-02776-x
PMID:38715032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11075206/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reports on long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients aged < 60 years are scarce in Japan. Hence, we aimed to evaluate these outcomes in patients aged < 60 years.

METHODS

Between March 2000 and December 2020, 1477 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. In total, 170 patients aged < 60 years who underwent aortic valve replacement were recruited. Patients aged < 18 years were excluded. Patient data collected from the operative records and follow-up assessments were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 49 ± 9 years, and 64.1% of patients were male. One-hundred-and-fifty-two patients (89.4%) underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve and 18 (10.6%) with a bioprosthetic valve. The mean follow-up period was 8.1 ± 5.5 years. No operative mortality occurred, and in-hospital mortality occurred in one patient (0.6%). Ten late deaths occurred, with seven cardiac-related deaths. The overall survival rate was 95.4 ± 1.7%, 93.9 ± 2.3%, 90.6 ± 3.9%, and 73.2 ± 11.8% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from major bleeding was 96.4 ± 1.6% at 5, 10, and 15 years, and 89.0 ± 7.3% at 20 years. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 98.7 ± 1.3%, 97.3 ± 1.9%, 90.5 ± 4.5%, and 79.0 ± 11.3% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from valve-related reoperation was 99.4 ± 0.6% at 5 years, 97.8 ± 1.7% at 10 and 15 years, and 63.9 ± 14.5% at 20 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients aged < 60 years undergoing aortic valve replacement with a high mechanical valve implantation rate had favorable long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

在日本,关于年龄<60 岁患者接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的长期结果的报告很少。因此,我们旨在评估这些年龄<60 岁患者的结果。

方法

2000 年 3 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,共有 1477 名患者接受了主动脉瓣置换术。共招募了 170 名年龄<60 岁接受主动脉瓣置换术的患者。排除年龄<18 岁的患者。从手术记录和随访评估中收集患者数据。

结果

平均年龄为 49±9 岁,64.1%的患者为男性。152 名(89.4%)患者接受机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术,18 名(10.6%)患者接受生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术。平均随访时间为 8.1±5.5 年。无手术死亡,住院期间死亡 1 例(0.6%)。10 例晚期死亡,其中 7 例与心脏相关。总体生存率为 95.4±1.7%、93.9±2.3%、90.6±3.9%和 73.2±11.8%,分别为 5、10、15 和 20 年。5、10 和 15 年时,主要出血无复发率为 96.4±1.6%,20 年时为 89.0±7.3%。血栓栓塞事件无复发率为 98.7±1.3%、97.3±1.9%、90.5±4.5%和 79.0±11.3%,分别为 5、10、15 和 20 年。瓣膜相关再次手术无复发率为 99.4±0.6%,5 年时为 97.8±1.7%,10 年和 15 年时为 90.5±14.5%,20 年时为 63.9±14.5%。

结论

接受高机械瓣植入率主动脉瓣置换术的年龄<60 岁患者具有良好的长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893f/11075206/40639bf0714d/13019_2024_2776_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893f/11075206/1591a22e2ca8/13019_2024_2776_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893f/11075206/40639bf0714d/13019_2024_2776_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893f/11075206/1591a22e2ca8/13019_2024_2776_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893f/11075206/40639bf0714d/13019_2024_2776_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Twenty-year experience following aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.60 岁以下主动脉瓣置换术患者 20 年的随访经验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 7;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02776-x.
2
Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.美敦力汉考克二代与双叶机械主动脉瓣置换术在60岁以下患者中的中长期疗效比较:倾向匹配分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):280-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv347. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
3
Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.60 岁以下患者行主动脉瓣置换术时使用心包组织瓣膜与机械瓣膜的 10 年对比。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Nov;144(5):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.024. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
4
Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.Carpentier-Edwards 心包生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的远期结果:1000 例患者长达 17 年的随访。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 May;89(5):1410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.046.
5
Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement.再次行主动脉瓣置换时生物瓣与机械瓣使用的长期评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;144(1):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.041. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
6
The perimount valve in the aortic position: twenty-year experience with patients under 60 years old.主动脉瓣位的瓣周漏:60 岁以下患者 20 年的经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.019. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.中年患者机械瓣膜置换与生物瓣膜置换的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Sep;30(3):485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
8
Twenty-year outcome of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical mechanical valves in Japanese patients.日本患者使用圣犹达医疗机械瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术的20年随访结果。
Circ J. 2015;79(11):2380-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0793. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Long-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age.60 岁以下患者行 Edwards Prima Plus 无支架生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的长期随访。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.032. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
10
Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.50 岁至 69 岁患者行生物瓣与机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的生存和长期预后。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1323-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12679.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Young, Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗年轻、低危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 14;14(11):1169-1180. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.058.
2
Propensity matched long-term analysis of mechanical versus stentless aortic valve replacement in the younger patient.年轻患者行机械瓣与无支架主动脉瓣置换的倾向性匹配长期分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 30;60(2):276-283. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab090.
3
JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020 Guidelines on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease.
JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020年心脏瓣膜病管理指南
Circ J. 2020 Oct 23;84(11):2037-2119. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0135. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Outcomes of tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients 50 to 70 years of age.50至70岁患者组织型与机械型主动脉瓣置换术的疗效
J Card Surg. 2020 Oct;35(10):2589-2597. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14844. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic valves.生物人工心脏瓣膜功能衰竭后经导管主动脉瓣植入术的长期疗效
Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2731-2742. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa544.
6
Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeries in Japan during 2017 : Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.2017年日本的胸心血管外科手术:日本胸外科学会年度报告
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;68(4):414-449. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01298-2.
7
Surgical explantation of transcatheter aortic bioprostheses: Results and clinical implications.经导管主动脉生物瓣的外科取出:结果和临床意义。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;162(2):539-547.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.139. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
8
Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.经导管 ViV 与再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术治疗生物瓣衰败:倾向评分匹配队列的早期和晚期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 23;13(6):765-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.030. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
9
Contemporary Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Japan.日本主动脉瓣置换术的当代结果。
Circ J. 2020 Jan 24;84(2):277-282. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0674. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
10
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.