• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

套筒冠技术:部分牙根拔除后种植体颊侧周围骨的稳定性——一项对20例患者进行18个月随访的前瞻性病例系列研究

The Socket Shield Technique: Stability of the Buccal Peri-implant Bone After Partial Root Removal-A Prospective Case Series of 20 Patients with 18 Months of Follow-up.

作者信息

Dhondt Rutger A L, Lahoud Pierre, Siawasch Manoetjer, Castro Ana B, Quirynen Marc, Temmerman Andy

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2025 Apr 25;45(3):329-339. doi: 10.11607/prd.6989.

DOI:10.11607/prd.6989
PMID:38717438
Abstract

This study aimed to collect data on implant survival, bone volume maintenance, and complications associated with the socket shield technique. The socket shield technique was introduced in 2010. Since then, several systematic reviews have been published that show good clinical outcomes. So far, the behavior of the buccal bone plate is not completely understood. The present study involved the placement of 23 implants in 20 patients using the socket shield technique. AstraTech EV im- plants were used, and no bone substitutes or connective tissue grafts were applied. Patients were monitored for 18 months, recording implant survival, volumetric bone analysis on CBCT scans, interproximal bone levels, bone sounding, pink esthetic scores, and complications. Prosthetic procedures were also described, including temporary and final restorations. Using the socket shield technique, a cumulative implant survival rate of 95.7% was obtained after 18 months, with a significant but limited reduction in buccal bone thickness (BBT) after implant placement. One implant did not integrate, and two shields were partially exposed. The mean pink esthetic score at 1 year postloading was 12.93 ± 1.22. The study suggests that the socket shield technique can result in a limited reduction of the buccal bone volume, with a high implant survival rate. Reentry studies are recommended to investigate the causes of bone resorption.

摘要

本研究旨在收集与牙槽窝保护技术相关的种植体存留率、骨量维持情况及并发症的数据。牙槽窝保护技术于2010年被引入。自那时起,已有数篇系统评价发表,显示出良好的临床效果。到目前为止,颊侧骨板的行为尚未完全明确。本研究使用牙槽窝保护技术为20例患者植入了23枚种植体。使用的是AstraTech EV种植体,未应用骨替代材料或结缔组织移植。对患者进行了18个月的监测,记录种植体存留情况、CBCT扫描的骨体积分析、邻间骨水平、骨探测、粉色美学评分及并发症。还描述了修复程序,包括临时和最终修复。采用牙槽窝保护技术,18个月后种植体累积存留率为95.7%,种植体植入后颊侧骨厚度(BBT)有显著但有限的减少。1枚种植体未成功骨结合,2个牙槽窝保护装置部分暴露。加载后1年的平均粉色美学评分为12.93±1.22。该研究表明,牙槽窝保护技术可导致颊侧骨量有限减少,种植体存留率高。建议进行再次研究以调查骨吸收的原因。

相似文献

1
The Socket Shield Technique: Stability of the Buccal Peri-implant Bone After Partial Root Removal-A Prospective Case Series of 20 Patients with 18 Months of Follow-up.套筒冠技术:部分牙根拔除后种植体颊侧周围骨的稳定性——一项对20例患者进行18个月随访的前瞻性病例系列研究
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2025 Apr 25;45(3):329-339. doi: 10.11607/prd.6989.
2
Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial.Socket shield 技术与传统即刻种植即刻临时修复的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Oct;22(5):602-611. doi: 10.1111/cid.12938. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Effect of Sagittal Root Position, Angle, and Bone Thickness on Peri-implant Tissue Phenotype and Bone Level in Socket Shield Technique: A Retrospective Case Series.矢状根位置、角度和骨厚度对种植体周围组织表型和Socket Shield 技术中骨水平的影响:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Aug 1;50(4):308-316. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00104.
4
Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up.即刻种植体直接接触与使用 socket shield 保持间隙对软组织和牙槽嵴稳定性的评估:一项为期 1 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):548-558. doi: 10.1111/cid.13117. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
The Modified Socket Shield Technique.改良型套筒冠技术。
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Nov;29(8):2247-2254. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004494.
6
Navigation guided socket-shield technique for implant and pontic sites in the esthetic zone: A proof-of-concept 1-year prospective study with immediate implant placement and loading.导航引导的种植体和桥体位点 socket-shield 技术:即刻种植即刻负载的 1 年前瞻性临床研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jan;34(1):203-214. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12867. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
7
[Dynamic monitoring and esthetic evaluation of dimensional changes in the peri-implant soft tissue contour after the immediate implant placement and provisionalization with the modified socket-shield technique in the esthetic zone].[美学区即刻种植并采用改良型牙槽窝屏障技术进行临时修复后种植体周围软组织轮廓尺寸变化的动态监测与美学评价]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 9;59(6):551-558. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240215-00072.
8
Soft and hard tissue evaluation of guided socket shield implant cases.引导式牙槽窝屏障种植病例的软硬组织评估
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2025 Mar;15(1):54-62. doi: 10.1002/cap.10290. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
9
Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports.Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports. 上颌窦提升同期种植体延期植入:五例病例系列报告。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02149-7.
10
A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up.回顾性评估 128 例美学区和后牙区种植覆盖义齿病例:最长 4 年的随访结果。部分拔牙病例。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr;20(2):122-129. doi: 10.1111/cid.12554. Epub 2017 Nov 26.