• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施世界卫生组织《安全分娩核对表》:范围综述方案。

Implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e084583. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084583.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084583
PMID:38719288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11086568/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (WHO SCC) was developed to accelerate adoption of essential practices that prevent maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality during childbirth. This study aims to summarise the current landscape of organisations and facilities that have implemented the WHO SCC and compare the published strategies used to implement the WHO SCC implementation in both successful and unsuccessful efforts.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review protocol follows the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data will be collected and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews report. The search strategy will include publications from the databases Scopus, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science, in addition to a search in grey literature in The National Library of Australia's Trobe, DART-Europe E-Theses Portal, Electronic Theses Online Service, Theses Canada, Google Scholar and Theses and dissertations from Latin America. Data extraction will include data on general information, study characteristics, organisations involved, sociodemographic context, implementation strategies, indicators of implementation process, frameworks used to design or evaluate the strategy, implementation outcomes and final considerations. Critical analysis of implementation strategies and outcomes will be performed with researchers with experience implementing the WHO SCC.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study does not require an ethical review due to its design as a scoping review of the literature. The results will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal and all relevant data from this study will be made available in Dataverse.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RWY27.

摘要

简介

世界卫生组织安全分娩清单(WHO SCC)旨在加速采用基本实践,以预防分娩期间产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在总结实施 WHO SCC 的组织和设施的现状,并比较成功和不成功实施 WHO SCC 所采用的已发表策略。

方法和分析

本范围综述方案遵循 Joanna Briggs 研究所的指南。数据将根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目进行收集和报告,以适应范围综述报告。搜索策略将包括 Scopus、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 数据库中的出版物,以及在澳大利亚国家图书馆的 Trobe、DART-Europe E-Theses Portal、Electronic Theses Online Service、加拿大论文、Google Scholar 和拉丁美洲论文和论文中的灰色文献搜索。数据提取将包括一般信息、研究特征、参与的组织、社会人口背景、实施策略、实施过程指标、用于设计或评估策略的框架、实施结果和最终考虑因素的数据。将与具有实施 WHO SCC 经验的研究人员一起对实施策略和结果进行批判性分析。

伦理和传播

由于该研究是对文献的范围综述,因此不需要进行伦理审查。研究结果将提交给科学期刊发表,本研究的所有相关数据将在 Dataverse 中提供。

注册号

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RWY27.

相似文献

1
Implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist: a scoping review protocol.实施世界卫生组织《安全分娩核对表》:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e084583. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084583.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Development and implementation determinants of competency frameworks for mental health clinicians and service providers working with youth: a scoping review protocol.精神健康临床医生和服务提供者与青年合作的能力框架的制定和实施决定因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e087437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087437.
4
Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol.评估具有风险分类的产科接待服务质量:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e066009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009.
5
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.
6
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Uterine fibroids and Black people of African descent globally: a scoping review protocol.全球范围内的子宫肌瘤和非裔非洲人:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 25;14(8):e085622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085622.
8
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
9
Screening, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of developmental dysplasia of the hip in Brazilian population: a scoping review protocol.巴西人群发育性髋关节发育不良的筛查、诊断、治疗和结局:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 14;14(10):e085403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085403.
10
Effectiveness of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (WHO-SCC) in preventing poor childbirth outcomes: a study protocol for a matched-pair cluster randomized control trial.世界卫生组织安全分娩清单(WHO-SCC)预防不良分娩结局的有效性:一项配对病例对照随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;21(1):1652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11673-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist on essential birth practices and adverse events in two Brazilian hospitals: a before and after study.世界卫生组织安全分娩清单的实施对巴西两家医院基本分娩实践和不良事件的影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 14;12(3):e056908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056908.
2
The WHO safe childbirth checklist after 5 years: future directions for improving outcomes.5年后世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表:改善分娩结局的未来方向
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Mar;10(3):e324-e325. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00556-8.
3
Adaptation and implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist around the world.世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表在全球的适配与实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 8;2(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00176-z.
4
Effectiveness of utilizing the WHO safe childbirth checklist on improving essential childbirth practices and maternal and perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利用世界卫生组织安全分娩清单提高基本分娩实践和母婴围产结局的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234320. eCollection 2020.
5
Delivery practices and care experience during implementation of an adapted safe childbirth checklist and respectful care program in Chiapas, Mexico.在墨西哥恰帕斯州实施经过改编的安全分娩清单和尊重护理方案期间的分娩实践和护理体验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):101-109. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12771.
6
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
7
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist: lessons from a global collaboration.实施世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表:全球合作的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Aug 19;2(3):e000241. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000241. eCollection 2017.
9
An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation.传播与实施的研究及评估设计概述
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:1-22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215.
10
Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study.使用概念图来描述实施策略之间的关系,并评估其可行性和重要性:实施变革专家建议(ERIC)研究的结果。
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 7;10:109. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0.