Bachur Richard G, Kaplan Sheldon L, Arias Cesar A, Ballard Natasha, Carroll Karen C, Cruz Andrea T, Gordon Richard, Halabi Salim, Harris Jeffrey D, Hulten Kristina G, Jacob Theresa, Kellogg Mark D, Klein Adi, Mishan Pninit Shaked, Motov Sergey M, Peck-Palmer Octavia M, Ryan Leticia M, Shapira Ma'anit, Suits George S, Wang Henry E, Weissman Alexandra, Rothman Richard E
Division of Emergency Medicine Boston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Division of Infectious Disease Texas Children's Hospital Houston Texas USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 May 8;5(3):e13167. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13167. eCollection 2024 Jun.
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid host-protein test for differentiating bacterial from viral infections in patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care center (UCC).
This was a prospective multicenter, blinded study. MeMed BV (MMBV), a test based on tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), and C-reactive protein (CRP), was measured using a rapid measurement platform. Patients were enrolled from 9 EDs and 3 UCCs in the United States and Israel. Patients >3 months of age presenting with fever and clinical suspicion of acute infection were considered eligible. MMBV results were not provided to the treating clinician. MMBV results (bacterial/viral/equivocal) were compared against a reference standard method for classification of infection etiology determined by expert panel adjudication. Experts were blinded to MMBV results. They were provided with comprehensive patient data, including laboratory, microbiological, radiological and follow-up.
Of 563 adults and children enrolled, 476 comprised the study population (314 adults, 162 children). The predominant clinical syndrome was respiratory tract infection (60.5% upper, 11.3% lower). MMBV demonstrated sensitivity of 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.3-99.7), specificity of 92.8% (90.0%-95.5%), and negative predictive value of 98.8% (96.8%-99.6%) for bacterial infections. Only 7.2% of cases yielded equivocal MMBV scores. Area under the curve for MMBV was 0.95 (0.90-0.99).
MMBV had a high sensitivity and specificity relative to reference standard for differentiating bacterial from viral infections. Future implementation of MMBV for patients with suspected acute infections could potentially aid with appropriate antibiotic decision-making.
确定一种快速宿主蛋白检测方法在急诊科(ED)或紧急护理中心(UCC)就诊患者中区分细菌感染与病毒感染的诊断准确性。
这是一项前瞻性多中心、盲法研究。使用快速检测平台检测基于肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)、干扰素γ诱导蛋白10(IP-10)和C反应蛋白(CRP)的MeMed BV(MMBV)检测。患者来自美国和以色列的9个急诊科和3个紧急护理中心。年龄大于3个月、出现发热且临床怀疑急性感染的患者被认为符合入选标准。MMBV检测结果未提供给治疗医生。将MMBV检测结果(细菌感染/病毒感染/不确定)与由专家小组判定的感染病因分类参考标准方法进行比较。专家对MMBV检测结果不知情。他们获得了全面的患者数据,包括实验室、微生物学、放射学和随访数据。
在纳入的563名成人和儿童中,476名构成研究人群(314名成人,162名儿童)。主要临床综合征为呼吸道感染(上呼吸道感染占60.5%,下呼吸道感染占11.3%)。MMBV对细菌感染的敏感性为90.0%(95%置信区间[CI]:80.3 - 99.7),特异性为92.8%(90.0% - 95.5%),阴性预测值为98.8%(96.8% - 99.6%)。只有7.2%的病例MMBV评分不确定。MMBV的曲线下面积为0.95(0.90 - 0.99)。
相对于区分细菌感染与病毒感染的参考标准,MMBV具有较高的敏感性和特异性。未来对疑似急性感染患者实施MMBV检测可能有助于做出适当的抗生素决策。