Jeong Wirawan, Saleh Shahad, Heap Sharon, Pham Vi, Leung Laura, Krishnaswamy Sushena
Pharmacy Department, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Infection Prevention and Control, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Oct;64(5):489-493. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13819. Epub 2024 May 9.
Unconfirmed beta-lactam allergy in pregnant people has been associated with higher morbidity, unnecessary exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged hospitalisation. There are no published data on beta-lactam allergies in pregnant people in Australia.
The aim was to describe patient-reported beta-lactam allergies and appropriateness for antibiotic allergy de-labelling in a maternity cohort in Australia.
Maternity patients aged ≥18 years admitted to our institution between March 2021 and June 2021 with a beta-lactam allergy documented in their electronic medical record were interviewed for details of their allergy. The documented allergies were compared to the allergy history obtained from the interview. Severity of the allergy was rated, and appropriateness for allergy de-labelling was assessed using the Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group beta-lactam antibiotic allergy assessment tool.
One hundred and fifty-three beta-lactam allergies (182 reactions) were reported by 145 patients. Penicillin class antibiotics were the most frequently implicated, including unspecified penicillins (95/153, 62%), amoxicillin (19/153, 13%) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (8/153, 5%). Allergy documentation required amending in 52 of 145 patients (36%); 85 of 153 (56%) of the beta-lactam allergies were considered low risk and potentially appropriate for direct oral re-challenge.
Beta-lactam allergies were inaccurately documented in more than one third of the maternity patients included in our study. As such, education of maternity care providers about the importance of accurate allergy history taking remains an urgent unmet need. Furthermore, allergy assessment and de-labelling during pregnancy should be considered in maternity patients to optimise antibiotic prescribing and to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
孕妇中未经证实的β-内酰胺类药物过敏与更高的发病率、不必要地暴露于广谱抗生素以及住院时间延长有关。澳大利亚尚无关于孕妇β-内酰胺类药物过敏的公开数据。
旨在描述澳大利亚一个产科队列中患者报告的β-内酰胺类药物过敏情况以及抗生素过敏解除标签的适宜性。
对2021年3月至2021年6月期间入住我院、年龄≥18岁且电子病历中有β-内酰胺类药物过敏记录的产科患者进行访谈,了解其过敏详情。将记录的过敏情况与访谈获得的过敏史进行比较。对过敏严重程度进行评级,并使用维多利亚治疗咨询小组的β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏评估工具评估过敏解除标签的适宜性。
145名患者报告了153例β-内酰胺类药物过敏(182次反应)。青霉素类抗生素是最常涉及的,包括未指明的青霉素(95/153,62%)、阿莫西林(19/153,13%)和阿莫西林-克拉维酸(8/153,5%)。145名患者中有52名(36%)的过敏记录需要修改;153例β-内酰胺类药物过敏中有85例(56%)被认为风险较低,可能适合直接口服重新激发试验。
在我们研究纳入的超过三分之一的产科患者中,β-内酰胺类药物过敏记录不准确。因此,对产科护理人员进行关于准确记录过敏史重要性的教育仍然是一项迫切未满足的需求。此外,对于产科患者,应考虑在孕期进行过敏评估和解除标签,以优化抗生素处方并改善母婴健康结局。