Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1338-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.063. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics are recommended for group B Streptococcus and cesarean section prophylaxis, but approximately 10% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy.
To assess the safety and impact of penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnant patients.
In this retrospective study of obstetrician-ordered Allergy/Immunology (AI) electronic consultations (e-consults) from September 20, 2017 through December 31, 2019, we reviewed the electronic health record for e-consult recommendation; patient demographic, obstetric, and allergy histories; and peripartum antibiotic utilization with indication. For patients whose electronic consultation recommended an in-person AI evaluation, testing outcomes were determined, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare antibiotic use between patients who did and did not receive an in-person AI evaluation.
Of 389 obstetrician-ordered e-consults, 363 (93%) recommended an in-person AI evaluation; of these, 222 (61%) patients received an in-person AI evaluation. Of 220 (99%) patients skin tested, 209 (95%) had their penicillin allergy label safely removed. Compared with patients who did not receive an in-person AI evaluation despite it being recommended (n = 141), patients with in-person AI evaluation (n = 222) had reduced peripartum vancomycin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33), clindamycin (aOR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08-0.34), and gentamicin (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.78) use and increased penicillin (aOR, 18.0; 95% CI, 6.30-51.2) use. The fully AI evaluated patients had increased first-line antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus (aOR, 26.9; 95% CI, 6.32-114) and cesarean section (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.06-3.52).
In a sample of 220 pregnant patients with penicillin allergy histories and in-person AI evaluation, penicillin allergy testing was safe and associated with significantly reduced broad-spectrum antibiotic use and increased first-line beta-lactam antibiotic use.
青霉素和其他β-内酰胺类抗生素被推荐用于 B 组链球菌和剖宫产预防,但约 10%的孕妇报告有青霉素过敏史。
评估孕妇青霉素过敏评估的安全性和影响。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们对 2017 年 9 月 20 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间妇产科医生开具的过敏/免疫学(AI)电子咨询(e-consults)进行了研究,我们回顾了电子健康记录中的 e-consult 推荐;患者的人口统计学、产科和过敏病史;以及围产期抗生素的使用情况及其适应证。对于电子咨询建议进行面对面 AI 评估的患者,我们确定了检测结果,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型比较了接受和未接受面对面 AI 评估的患者之间抗生素的使用情况。
在 389 次妇产科医生开具的 e-consults 中,有 363 次(93%)建议进行面对面 AI 评估;其中,222 名(61%)患者接受了面对面 AI 评估。在 220 名接受皮肤测试的患者中,209 名(95%)安全去除了青霉素过敏标签。与尽管推荐但未接受面对面 AI 评估的患者(n=141)相比,接受面对面 AI 评估的患者(n=222)围产期万古霉素(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.07;95%置信区间,0.01-0.33)、克林霉素(aOR,0.17;95%置信区间,0.08-0.34)和庆大霉素(aOR,0.39;95%置信区间,0.19-0.78)的使用减少,而青霉素(aOR,18.0;95%置信区间,6.30-51.2)的使用增加。这些经过全面 AI 评估的患者,用于预防 B 组链球菌(aOR,26.9;95%置信区间,6.32-114)和剖宫产(aOR,1.94;95%置信区间,1.06-3.52)的一线抗生素预防显著增加。
在 220 名有青霉素过敏史并接受面对面 AI 评估的孕妇样本中,青霉素过敏检测是安全的,与广谱抗生素使用显著减少和一线β-内酰胺类抗生素使用增加显著相关。