Strelchuk Daniela, Wiles Nicola, Turner Katrina, Derrick Catherine, Martin David, Davies Jonathan, Zammit Stan
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK; and National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK; and Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2024 May 9;10(3):e105. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.57.
Trauma plays an important role in the development of psychosis, but no studies have investigated whether a trauma-focused therapy could prevent psychosis.
This study aimed to establish whether it would be feasible to conduct a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to prevent psychosis in people with an at-risk mental state (ARMS), using eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy (EMDR).
This started as a mixed-method randomised study comparing EMDR to treatment as usual but, as a result of low participant recruitment, was changed to a single-arm feasibility study. The proposed primary outcome for an RCT was transition to psychosis at 12-month follow-up. Data on secondary outcomes were also collected. Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients and therapists.
Fourteen participants were recruited from the Early Intervention teams. Most people who expressed an interest in taking part attended an assessment to determine eligibility. All those eligible consented to take part. A total of 64% (7 of 11) of participants who were offered EMDR were followed up at 12 months. Of the 11 participants offered EMDR, one (11%, 95% CI: 0.2%, 48%) transitioned to psychosis. Nine patients and three therapists were interviewed. Participants who completed therapy ( = 4; mean 10.5 sessions) found EMDR helpful, but those who discontinued ( = 6; mean 5.2 sessions) said it had not benefitted them overall. Therapists said EMDR could be effective, although not for all patients.
Future studies recruiting people with an ARMS to an RCT may need to extend recruitment beyond Early Intervention teams. Although some individuals found EMDR helpful, reasons for discontinuing need to be addressed in future studies.
创伤在精神病的发展中起重要作用,但尚无研究调查以创伤为重点的治疗是否能预防精神病。
本研究旨在确定使用眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)对处于精神病风险状态(ARMS)的人群进行多中心随机对照试验(RCT)以预防精神病是否可行。
本研究最初是一项将EMDR与常规治疗进行比较的混合方法随机研究,但由于参与者招募人数较少,改为单组可行性研究。RCT的拟主要结局是在12个月随访时转变为精神病。还收集了次要结局的数据。对患者和治疗师进行了定性访谈。
从早期干预团队招募了14名参与者。大多数表示有兴趣参与的人参加了资格评估。所有符合条件的人都同意参与。接受EMDR治疗的参与者中有64%(11人中的7人)在12个月时接受了随访。在接受EMDR治疗的11名参与者中,有1人(11%,95%CI:0.2%,48%)转变为精神病。对9名患者和3名治疗师进行了访谈。完成治疗的参与者(n = 4;平均10.5次治疗)认为EMDR有帮助,但中断治疗的参与者(n = 6;平均5.2次治疗)表示总体上没有从中受益。治疗师表示EMDR可能有效,尽管并非对所有患者都有效。
未来招募处于ARMS状态人群进行RCT的研究可能需要将招募范围扩大到早期干预团队之外。尽管一些人认为EMDR有帮助,但未来研究需要解决中断治疗的原因。