Flinn Aidan, Hefferman-Clarke Rebecca, Parker Sophie, Allsopp Kate, Zhou Lan, Begemann Marieke, Bentall Richard, Varese Filippo
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, https://ror.org/027m9bs27University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Psychol Med. 2025 May 29;55:e162. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725001138.
Past meta-analyses have confirmed robust associations between childhood traumatic experiences and the risk of psychosis. However, the dose-response relationship between cumulative adversity exposure and psychosis risk observed in some, but not all, previous studies in this area has not been specifically scrutinized or substantiated via recommended meta-analytic methods. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence on dose-response effects between childhood trauma and psychosis outcomes.
PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and WANFANG were searched from inception to July 2024 to identify observational studies reporting odds ratios for psychosis outcomes across multiple levels of childhood trauma exposure. Dose-response effects were extracted from eligible studies and synthesized via robust error meta-regression analyses.
Twenty-one studies comprising 59,975 participants were included in the meta-analysis. A significant nonlinear relationship was observed between the number of childhood adversities and the risk of future psychosis experiences ( for nonlinearity = .021). The pooled odds ratio for psychosis increased from 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.22) for 1 exposure to 6.46 (95% CI: 4.37-9.53) for 5+ exposures compared to no traumatic experience.
This meta-analysis provides robust evidence for a dose-response relationship between cumulative childhood adversity and psychosis risk, with nonlinear patterns suggestive of an accelerating, more pronounced, risk at higher levels of trauma exposure. These findings underscore the importance of considering childhood traumatic experiences as a putative and potentially causative risk factor for psychotic experiences, as well as early prevention and intervention efforts targeting childhood adversity to reduce the risk of psychosis.
以往的荟萃分析已证实童年创伤经历与精神病风险之间存在密切关联。然而,该领域一些(但并非全部)先前研究中观察到的累积逆境暴露与精神病风险之间的剂量反应关系,尚未通过推荐的荟萃分析方法进行专门审查或证实。本荟萃分析旨在综合关于童年创伤与精神病结局之间剂量反应效应的现有证据。
检索了从创刊至2024年7月的PsycINFO、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、中国知网和万方数据库,以识别报告了不同童年创伤暴露水平下精神病结局比值比的观察性研究。从符合条件的研究中提取剂量反应效应,并通过稳健误差元回归分析进行综合。
荟萃分析纳入了21项研究,共59975名参与者。观察到童年逆境数量与未来患精神病风险之间存在显著的非线性关系(非线性检验P = 0.021)。与无创伤经历相比,精神病的合并比值比从1次暴露时的1.76(95%置信区间[CI]:1.39 - 2.22)增加到5次及以上暴露时的6.46(95%CI:4.37 - 9.53)。
本荟萃分析为童年累积逆境与精神病风险之间的剂量反应关系提供了有力证据,非线性模式表明在更高水平的创伤暴露下风险加速且更为显著。这些发现强调了将童年创伤经历视为精神病体验的假定且可能的致病风险因素的重要性,以及针对童年逆境进行早期预防和干预以降低精神病风险的重要性。