Kelling Marit, Currie Shannon E, Troxell Sara A, Reusch Christine, Roeleke Manuel, Hoffmeister Uwe, Teige Tobias, Voigt Christian C
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany.
University of Potsdam, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, Potsdam, Germany.
Mov Ecol. 2024 May 9;12(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00477-7.
External tags, such as transmitters and loggers, are often used to study bat movements. However, physiological and behavioural effects on bats carrying tags have rarely been investigated, and recommendations on the maximum acceptable tag mass are rather based on rules of thumb than on rigorous scientific assessment.
We conducted a comprehensive three-step assessment of the potential physiological and behavioural effects of tagging bats, using common noctules Nyctalus noctula as a model. First, we examined seasonal changes in body mass. Second, we predicted and then measured potential changes in flight metabolic rate in a wind tunnel. Third, we conducted a meta-analysis of published data to assess effects of different tag masses on the weight and behaviour of bats.
Individual body mass of common noctules varied seasonally by 7.0 ± 2.6 g (range: 0.5-11.5 g). Aerodynamic theory predicted a 26% increase in flight metabolic rate for a common noctule equipped with a 3.8 g tag, equating to 14% of body mass. In a wind tunnel experiment, we could not confirm the predicted increase for tagged bats. Our meta-analysis revealed a weak correlation between tag mass and emergence time and flight duration in wild bats. Interestingly, relative tag mass (3-19% of bat body mass) was not related to body mass loss, but bats lost more body mass the longer tags were attached. Notably, relatively heavy bats lost more mass than conspecifics with a more average body mass index.
Because heavy tags (> 3 g) were generally used for shorter periods of time than lighter tags (~ 1 g), the long-term effects of heavy tags on bats cannot be assessed at this time. Furthermore, the effects of disturbance and resource distribution in the landscape cannot be separated from those of tagging. We recommend that tags weighing 5-10% of a bat's mass should only be applied for a few days. For longer studies, tags weighing less than 5% of a bat's body mass should be used. To avoid adverse effects on bats, researchers should target individuals with average, rather than peak, body mass indices.
外部标签,如发射器和记录器,常用于研究蝙蝠的活动。然而,携带标签对蝙蝠生理和行为的影响鲜有研究,关于最大可接受标签质量的建议更多是基于经验法则,而非严格的科学评估。
我们以普通长翼蝠(Nyctalus noctula)为模型,对给蝙蝠佩戴标签可能产生的生理和行为影响进行了全面的三步评估。首先,我们研究了体重的季节性变化。其次,我们预测并随后在风洞中测量了飞行代谢率的潜在变化。第三,我们对已发表的数据进行了荟萃分析,以评估不同标签质量对蝙蝠体重和行为的影响。
普通长翼蝠的个体体重随季节变化,差异为7.0±2.6克(范围:0.5 - 11.5克)。空气动力学理论预测,佩戴3.8克标签的普通长翼蝠飞行代谢率将增加26%,相当于体重的14%。在风洞实验中,我们未能证实佩戴标签的蝙蝠飞行代谢率会如预测般增加。我们的荟萃分析揭示,标签质量与野生蝙蝠的出飞时间和飞行时长之间存在微弱关联。有趣的是,相对标签质量(占蝙蝠体重的3 - 19%)与体重减轻无关,但标签佩戴时间越长,蝙蝠体重减轻越多。值得注意的是,相对较重的蝙蝠比体重指数更接近平均水平的同种蝙蝠体重减轻得更多。
由于较重的标签(>3克)通常比较轻的标签(~1克)使用时间更短,目前无法评估重标签对蝙蝠的长期影响。此外,景观中干扰和资源分布的影响无法与佩戴标签的影响区分开来。我们建议,重量占蝙蝠体重5 - 10%的标签仅应使用几天。对于更长时间的研究,应使用重量小于蝙蝠体重5%的标签。为避免对蝙蝠产生不利影响,研究人员应选择体重指数处于平均水平而非峰值的个体。