• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们距离实现消除错误的青霉素/β-内酰胺过敏警报还有多远?一个群体问题。

How Far Are We From Achieving Delabeling of False Penicillin/ß-Lactam Allergy Alerts? A Population Problem.

作者信息

Tejedor-Alonso M A, Perez-Encinas M, Sanz Márquez S, Martinez Simon J J, Moreno-Nuñez L, Gonzalez-Moreno A, Macias-Iglesias J, Rosado-Ingelmo A

机构信息

Allergy Unit, University Hospital Fundación Alcorcon, Alcorcón, Spain.

Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Department Public Health and Medical Specialties, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2025 Feb 18;35(1):12-23. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.1004. Epub 2024 May 9.

DOI:10.18176/jiaci.1004
PMID:38725322
Abstract

Interest in finding efficient ways to remove penicillin allergy alerts has grown as a result of awareness of the considerable excess of falsenegative diagnoses in patients with penicillin allergy labels (90%-95%), the poorer course with non-ß-lactam antibiotics, the increase in bacterial resistance, and the fact that these problems can affect up to 20% of the population in some countries. The strategies proposed have generated many publications in countries where the number of allergists to conduct such studies is low. In many cases where delabeling is performed, the risk of ß-lactam allergy is low, and a single penicillin challenge is sufficient to delabel the alert. However, other less "ultrarapid" strategies can be used to administer a ß-lactam during an admission for infection and thus postpone delabeling until traditional drug allergy consultations. However, the definitive withdrawal of ß-lactam alerts is threatened by nonremoval of alerts in electronic health records and by the reactivation or nonsynchronization of alerts between electronic systems at different levels of care. Allergy departments need to reflect on how to implement practices that enable rapid and efficient delabeling of drug allergy alerts, especially in patients with major comorbidities.

摘要

由于认识到青霉素过敏标签患者中存在大量假阴性诊断(90%-95%)、使用非β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗效果较差、细菌耐药性增加,以及在某些国家这些问题可能影响高达20%的人口,人们对寻找有效方法去除青霉素过敏警示的兴趣日益浓厚。在开展此类研究的过敏症专科医生数量较少的国家,所提出的策略已催生了许多相关出版物。在许多进行标签去除的案例中,β-内酰胺过敏风险较低,单次青霉素激发试验就足以去除警示。然而,在因感染入院期间,也可采用其他不那么“超快速”的策略来使用β-内酰胺类药物,从而将标签去除推迟至传统药物过敏会诊时进行。然而,电子健康记录中警示未被去除,以及不同护理级别电子系统之间警示的重新激活或不同步,都对最终撤销β-内酰胺警示构成了威胁。过敏科需要思考如何实施相关做法,以便快速、有效地去除药物过敏警示,尤其是在患有严重合并症的患者中。

相似文献

1
How Far Are We From Achieving Delabeling of False Penicillin/ß-Lactam Allergy Alerts? A Population Problem.我们距离实现消除错误的青霉素/β-内酰胺过敏警报还有多远?一个群体问题。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2025 Feb 18;35(1):12-23. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.1004. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Incidence of interruptive penicillin allergy alerts in patients with previously documented beta-lactam exposure: Potential for leveraging the electronic health record to identify erroneous allergies.曾有β-内酰胺暴露史患者中青霉素过敏警示中断的发生率:利用电子健康记录识别错误过敏反应的可能性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1108-1111. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.329. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3
Prospective, Multicenter, Head-to-Head Comparison Between Allergists Versus Nonallergists in Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Effectiveness, Safety, and Quality of Life (HK-DADI2).前瞻性、多中心、过敏专科医生与非过敏专科医生在低风险青霉素过敏脱标签治疗中的头对头比较:有效性、安全性和生活质量(HK-DADI2)。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jul;12(7):1801-1808.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review.青霉素过敏的评估与管理:综述
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):188-199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283.
5
Promoting β-lactam utilization through suppression of electronic medical record cross-allergy alerts.通过抑制电子病历交叉过敏警示来促进β-内酰胺类药物的使用。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 May 24;79(Suppl 2):S43-S52. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac040.
6
Nonallergist Delabeling-Should Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Only Be Performed by Allergists?非过敏症专科医生去除标注——青霉素过敏标注的去除是否应仅由过敏症专科医生进行?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 May;13(5):1011-1017.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.11.028. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
7
Characterizing Antibiotic Allergy Labels in a Large UK Hospital Population to Inform Antimicrobial Stewardship and Delabeling Assessment Strategy.对英国一家大型医院的大量患者的抗生素过敏标签进行特征分析,以指导抗菌药物管理和去标签评估策略。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Jul;11(7):2180-2189.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.056. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
8
Follow-up of penicillin allergy labels 1 year after successful penicillin delabeling.青霉素脱敏成功一年后青霉素过敏标签的随访。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Jan;130(1):80-83.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Multidisciplinary Opportunity.青霉素过敏标签修正:一个多学科的机会。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2858-2868.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.059.
10
Drug Allergy Delabeling Programs: Recent Strategies and Targeted Populations.药物过敏标签外使用计划:最新策略和目标人群。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jun;62(3):484-504. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08913-x. Epub 2022 Jan 15.