• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倡导与生命伦理学:愿望、义务与协商。

Advocacy and Bioethics: Aspiration, Obligation, and Negotiation.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2024 Summer;35(2):142-146. doi: 10.1086/729418.

DOI:10.1086/729418
PMID:38728699
Abstract

AbstractA long-standing tenet of healthcare clinical ethics consultation has involved the neutrality of the ethicist. However, recent pressing societal issues have challenged this viewpoint. Perhaps now more than ever before, ethicists are being called upon to take up roles in public health, policy, and other community-oriented endeavors. In this article, I first review the concept of and contrast this conceptualization with the role of , utilizing the profession of nursing as an exemplar. Then, I explore the status of advocacy in clinical ethics and how this conversation intersects with the existing professional obligations of the bioethicist, arguing that the goals of ethics consultation and ethical obligations of the clinical ethicist are compatible with the role of professional advocate. Finally, I explore potential barriers to professional advocacy and offer suggestions for a path forward.

摘要

摘要 医疗保健临床伦理咨询的一个长期原则涉及伦理学家的中立性。然而,最近紧迫的社会问题挑战了这一观点。也许现在比以往任何时候都更需要伦理学家在公共卫生、政策和其他面向社区的努力中发挥作用。在本文中,我首先回顾了 的概念,并利用护理专业为例对这一概念进行了对比。然后,我探讨了临床伦理中的倡导地位,以及这一对话如何与生物伦理学家的现有专业义务交叉,并认为伦理咨询的目标和临床伦理学家的道德义务与专业倡导者的角色是兼容的。最后,我探讨了专业倡导可能面临的障碍,并为前进的道路提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Advocacy and Bioethics: Aspiration, Obligation, and Negotiation.倡导与生命伦理学:愿望、义务与协商。
J Clin Ethics. 2024 Summer;35(2):142-146. doi: 10.1086/729418.
2
Defending the jurisdiction of the clinical ethicist.捍卫临床伦理学家的管辖权。
J Clin Ethics. 2014 Spring;25(1):20-31.
3
A semantic exploration: Nurse ethicist, medical ethicist, or clinical ethicist: Do distinctions matter?语义探索:护士伦理学家、医学伦理学家还是临床伦理学家:这些区别重要吗?
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Aug;30(5):659-670. doi: 10.1177/09697330221146251.
4
Invoking the law in ethics consultation.在伦理咨询中援引法律。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Fall;2(4):457-67. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100004497.
5
\Defining Patient Advocacy for the Context of Clinical Ethics Consultation: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Consultants.界定临床伦理咨询背景下的患者维权:文献综述及对咨询人员的建议
J Clin Ethics. 2016 summer;27(2):176-84.
6
The problem of the impaired clinical ethicist.临床伦理学家能力受损的问题。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jan;18(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30499-7.
7
The feminist health care ethics consultant as architect and advocate.作为架构师和倡导者的女性主义医疗伦理顾问。
Public Aff Q. 2003 Apr;17(2):141-58.
8
Operationalizing the role of the nurse ethicist: More than a job.使护士伦理学家的角色运作化:不仅仅是一份工作。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Aug;30(5):688-700. doi: 10.1177/09697330221147898.
9
Clinical Ethics Consultation After God: Implications for Advocacy and Neutrality.“上帝”之后的临床伦理咨询:对倡导与中立的影响
HEC Forum. 2018 Jun;30(2):103-115. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9340-5.
10
Role responsibilities in clinical bioethics: the dialectic of consultation -- comments on the case presented by Barbara Springer Edwards.临床生物伦理学中的角色职责:咨询的辩证法——评芭芭拉·斯普林格·爱德华兹所呈现的案例
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Spring;1(1):79-82.