Koeppe R A, Holden J E, Ip W R
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985 Jun;5(2):224-34. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.29.
Local CBF (LCBF) can be quantitated from positron computed tomographic (PCT) data and physiologically based mathematical models by several general methods. Those using a dynamic sequence of PCT scans allow the simultaneous estimation of both LCBF and p, the indicator's tissue-blood partition coefficient. This article presents a comparison of three rapid estimation techniques for use with inert diffusible radioindicators and serial PCT, each of which is based on the original Kety model. One method, developed in our laboratory, involves minimizing the mean squared discrepancy between measured data and model predictions, whereas the other two methods, recently reported in the literature, are weighted integration techniques that involve multiplying the measured data by time-dependent weighting functions. Simulation studies of noise propagation and other sources of error were performed under a variety of simulated conditions. Functional images of LCBF and p were calculated using each method for both phantom and human subject data. Errors can differ by as much as a factor of 2-3 between methods, with each having its own unique advantages and disadvantages.
局部脑血流量(LCBF)可通过几种通用方法从正电子计算机断层扫描(PCT)数据和基于生理学的数学模型中进行定量分析。那些使用PCT动态扫描序列的方法可以同时估算LCBF和p(指示剂的组织-血液分配系数)。本文比较了三种用于惰性可扩散放射性指示剂和连续PCT的快速估算技术,每种技术均基于原始的凯蒂模型。一种是我们实验室开发的方法,即最小化测量数据与模型预测之间的均方差异,而另外两种方法是最近在文献中报道的加权积分技术,即将测量数据乘以随时间变化的加权函数。在各种模拟条件下进行了噪声传播和其他误差源的模拟研究。使用每种方法对模型和人体受试者数据计算了LCBF和p的功能图像。不同方法之间的误差可能相差2到3倍,每种方法都有其独特的优缺点。