Pediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):475-480. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213466.
The ability to rule appendicitis in or out using ultrasound is limited by studies where the appendix is not visualised. We determined whether the absence of indirect ultrasound signs can rule out appendicitis in children undergoing a radiology-performed ultrasound in which the appendix is not visualised METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective observational study of patients aged 3-13 with a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis evaluated in a Paediatric Emergency Department in Spain from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019. For those patients who had formal ultrasound, direct and indirect findings of ultrasound were abstracted from the ultrasound report. The surgical pathology report was established as the gold standard in patients who underwent an appendectomy. In those who did not, appendicitis was considered not to be present if there was no evidence in their charts that they had undergone an appendectomy or conservative therapy for appendicitis during the episode. The main outcome variable was the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. For patients undergoing ultrasound, the independent association of each indirect ultrasound sign with the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients without a visualised appendix was analysed using logistic regression.
We included 1756 encounters from 1609 different episodes. Median age at the first visit of each episode was 10.1 years (IQR, 7.7-11.9) and 921 (57.2%) patients were men. There were 730 (41.6%) encounters with an Alvarado score ≤3, 695 (39.6%) with a score 4-6 and 331 (18.9%) with a score ≥7. Appendicitis was diagnosed in 293 (17.8%) episodes. Ultrasonography was performed in 1115 (61.6%) encounters, with a visualised appendix in 592 (53.1%).The ultrasound findings independently associated with appendicitis in patients without a visualised appendix were the presence of free intra-abdominal fluid in a small quantity (OR:5.0 (95% CI 1.7 to 14.6)) or in an abundant quantity (OR:30.9 (95% CI 3.8 to 252.7)) and inflammation of the peri-appendiceal fat (OR:7.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 38.0)). The absence of free fluid and inflammation of the peri-appendiceal fat ruled out acute appendicitis in patients with an Alvarado score <7 with a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI 57.8 to 95.7) and a negative predictive value of 99.4% (95% CI 97.8 to 99.8).
Patients with an Alvarado score <7 and without a visualised appendix on ultrasound but who lack free fluid and inflammation of the peri-appendiceal fat are at very low risk of acute appendicitis.
由于研究中阑尾未显影,利用超声排除或确诊阑尾炎的能力受到限制。本研究旨在明确在阑尾未显影的情况下,间接超声征象的缺失是否能排除儿童阑尾炎。
这是一项单中心回顾性观察研究,纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间在西班牙儿科急诊就诊的 3-13 岁、有急性阑尾炎临床怀疑的患者。对于接受了正式超声检查的患者,从超声报告中提取直接和间接超声发现。阑尾切除术的手术病理报告被确定为金标准。对于未行阑尾切除术的患者,如果病历中没有证据表明他们在该次发病期间接受了阑尾切除术或保守治疗,则认为不存在阑尾炎。主要结局变量是急性阑尾炎的诊断。对于接受超声检查的患者,使用逻辑回归分析阑尾未显影的患者中每个间接超声征象与阑尾炎诊断的独立关联。
共纳入了 1609 例不同发病事件中的 1756 次就诊。每次发病事件的中位首诊年龄为 10.1 岁(IQR,7.7-11.9),921 例(57.2%)患者为男性。730 次就诊(41.6%)的 Alvarado 评分≤3,695 次就诊(39.6%)的评分 4-6,331 次就诊(18.9%)的评分≥7。293 次就诊(17.8%)被诊断为阑尾炎。1115 次就诊(61.6%)进行了超声检查,592 次就诊(53.1%)显示阑尾显影。阑尾未显影的患者中,与阑尾炎独立相关的超声发现为少量(OR:5.0(95%CI 1.7 至 14.6))或大量(OR:30.9(95%CI 3.8 至 252.7))游离腹腔积液和阑尾周围脂肪炎症。无游离液体和阑尾周围脂肪炎症可排除 Alvarado 评分<7 的患者发生急性阑尾炎,其敏感性为 84.6%(95%CI 57.8 至 95.7),阴性预测值为 99.4%(95%CI 97.8 至 99.8)。
Alvarado 评分<7 且阑尾未显影但无游离腹腔积液和阑尾周围脂肪炎症的患者发生急性阑尾炎的风险极低。