Department of Big Data in Health Science, School of Public Health, and Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Big Data in Health Science, School of Public Health, and Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Sep;127:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 9.
There is a lack of consensus in evaluating multidimensional sleep health, especially concerning its implication for mortality. A validated multidimensional sleep health score is the foundation of effective interventions.
We obtained data from 5706 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study. First, random forest-recursive feature elimination algorithm was used to select potential predictive variables. Second, a sleep composite score was developed based on the regression coefficients from a Cox proportional hazards model evaluating the associations between selected sleep-related variables and mortality. Last, we validated the score by constructing Cox proportional hazards models to assess its association with mortality.
The mean age of participants was 63.2 years old, and 47.6% (2715/5706) were male. Six sleep variables, including average oxygen saturation (%), spindle density (C3), sleep efficiency (%), spindle density (C4), percentage of fast spindles (%) and percentage of rapid eye movement (%) were selected to construct this multidimensional sleep health score. The average sleep composite score in participants was 6.8 of 22 (lower is better). Participants with a one-point increase in sleep composite score had an 10% higher risk of death (hazard ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.12).
This study constructed and validated a novel multidimensional sleep health score to better predict death based on sleep, with significant associations between sleep composite score and all-cause mortality. Integrating questionnaire information and sleep microstructures, our sleep composite score is more appropriately applied for mortality risk stratification.
多维睡眠健康的评估缺乏共识,尤其是其对死亡率的影响。一个经过验证的多维睡眠健康评分是有效干预的基础。
我们从睡眠心脏健康研究的 5706 名参与者中获取数据。首先,随机森林递归特征消除算法用于选择潜在的预测变量。其次,根据 Cox 比例风险模型的回归系数,构建一个睡眠综合评分,该模型评估了选定的与睡眠相关变量与死亡率之间的关系。最后,我们通过构建 Cox 比例风险模型来验证该评分,以评估其与死亡率的相关性。
参与者的平均年龄为 63.2 岁,其中 47.6%(2715/5706)为男性。六个睡眠变量,包括平均氧饱和度(%)、纺锤密度(C3)、睡眠效率(%)、纺锤密度(C4)、快波纺锤波百分比(%)和快速眼动百分比(%)被选来构建这个多维睡眠健康评分。参与者的平均睡眠综合评分为 22 分中的 6.8 分(分数越低越好)。睡眠综合评分每增加 1 分,死亡风险增加 10%(风险比=1.10,95%置信区间:1.08-1.12)。
本研究构建并验证了一种新的多维睡眠健康评分,以更好地基于睡眠预测死亡,睡眠综合评分与全因死亡率之间存在显著关联。整合问卷信息和睡眠微观结构,我们的睡眠综合评分更适合用于死亡风险分层。