Cohen Jennifer, Duong Son Q, Arivazhagan Naveen, Barris David M, Bebiya Surkhay, Castaldo Rosalie, Gayanilo Marjorie, Hopkins Kali, Kailas Maya, Kong Grace, Ma Xiye, Marshall Molly, Paul Erin A, Tan Melanie, Yau Jen Lie, Nadkarni Girish N, Ezon David
Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Heart Center, The Mount Sinai Hospital, 1468 Madison Ave, Annenberg 3rd Floor, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Apr;46(4):884-894. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03511-y. Epub 2024 May 10.
Assessment of pulmonary regurgitation (PR) guides treatment for patients with congenital heart disease. Quantitative assessment of PR fraction (PRF) by echocardiography is limited. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) is the reference-standard for PRF quantification. We created an algorithm to predict cMRI-quantified PRF from echocardiography using machine learning (ML). We retrospectively performed echocardiographic measurements paired to cMRI within 3 months in patients with ≥ mild PR from 2009 to 2022. Model inputs were vena contracta ratio, PR index, PR pressure half-time, main and branch pulmonary artery diastolic flow reversal (BPAFR), and transannular patch repair. A gradient boosted trees ML algorithm was trained using k-fold cross-validation to predict cMRI PRF by phase contrast imaging as a continuous number and at > mild (PRF ≥ 20%) and severe (PRF ≥ 40%) thresholds. Regression performance was evaluated with mean absolute error (MAE), and at clinical thresholds with area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC). Prediction accuracy was compared to historical clinician accuracy. We externally validated prior reported studies for comparison. We included 243 subjects (median age 21 years, 58% repaired tetralogy of Fallot). The regression MAE = 7.0%. For prediction of > mild PR, AUROC = 0.96, but BPAFR alone outperformed the ML model (sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%). The ML model detection of severe PR had AUROC = 0.86, but in the subgroup with BPAFR, performance dropped (AUROC = 0.73). Accuracy between clinicians and the ML model was similar (70% vs. 69%). There was decrement in performance of prior reported algorithms on external validation in our dataset. A novel ML model for echocardiographic quantification of PRF outperforms prior studies and has comparable overall accuracy to clinicians. BPAFR is an excellent marker for > mild PRF, and has moderate capacity to detect severe PR, but more work is required to distinguish moderate from severe PR. Poor external validation of prior works highlights reproducibility challenges.
肺动脉反流(PR)评估指导先天性心脏病患者的治疗。超声心动图对PR分数(PRF)的定量评估存在局限性。心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)是PRF定量的参考标准。我们创建了一种算法,利用机器学习(ML)从超声心动图预测cMRI定量的PRF。我们回顾性地对2009年至2022年患有≥轻度PR的患者在3个月内进行了与cMRI配对的超声心动图测量。模型输入包括反流束宽度比值、PR指数、PR压力半衰期、主肺动脉和分支肺动脉舒张期血流逆转(BPAFR)以及跨环补片修复。使用k折交叉验证训练梯度提升树ML算法,以通过相位对比成像将cMRI PRF预测为连续数值,并在>轻度(PRF≥20%)和重度(PRF≥40%)阈值下进行预测。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)评估回归性能,并在临床阈值下使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)进行评估。将预测准确性与历史临床医生的准确性进行比较。我们对先前报道的研究进行外部验证以作比较。我们纳入了243名受试者(中位年龄21岁,58%为法洛四联症修复术后患者)。回归MAE = 7.0%。对于>轻度PR的预测,AUROC = 0.96,但仅BPAFR的表现优于ML模型(敏感性94%,特异性97%)。ML模型对重度PR的检测AUROC = 0.86,但在有BPAFR的亚组中,性能下降(AUROC = 0.73)。临床医生和ML模型之间的准确性相似(70%对69%)。在我们的数据集中,先前报道的算法在外部验证时性能有所下降。一种用于超声心动图定量PRF的新型ML模型优于先前的研究,并且总体准确性与临床医生相当。BPAFR是>轻度PRF的优秀标志物,检测重度PR的能力中等,但需要更多工作来区分中度和重度PR。先前研究的外部验证不佳凸显了可重复性挑战。