Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec;41(3):779-787. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01993-5. Epub 2024 May 10.
Optimal pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis dosing is not well described in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Our patients with SAH with an EVD who receive prophylactic enoxaparin are routinely monitored using timed anti-Xa levels. Our primary study goal was to determine the frequency of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and secondary intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) for this population of patients who received pharmacologic prophylaxis with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH).
A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with SAH admitted to the neurocritical care unit at Emory University Hospital between 2012 and 2017. All patients with SAH who required an EVD were included.
Of 1,351 patients screened, 868 required an EVD. Of these 868 patients, 627 received enoxaparin, 114 received UFH, and 127 did not receive pharmacologic prophylaxis. VTE occurred in 7.5% of patients in the enoxaparin group, 4.4% in the UFH group (p = 0.32), and 3.2% in the no VTE prophylaxis group (p = 0.08). Secondary ICH occurred in 3.83% of patients in the enoxaparin group, 3.51% in the UFH group (p = 1), and 3.94% in the no VTE prophylaxis group (p = 0.53). As steady-state anti-Xa levels increased from 0.1 units/mL to > 0.3 units/mL, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of VTE. However, no correlation was noted between rising anti-Xa levels and an increased incidence of secondary ICH. When compared, neither enoxaparin nor UFH use was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of VTE or an increased incidence of ICH.
In this retrospective study of patients with nontraumatic SAH with an EVD who received enoxaparin or UFH VTE prophylaxis or no VTE prophylaxis, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of VTE or secondary ICH. For patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin, achieving higher steady-state target anti-Xa levels may be associated with a lower incidence of VTE without increasing the risk of secondary ICH.
患有蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)并伴有脑室外引流(EVD)的患者,其最佳药物性血栓预防剂量并未得到很好的描述。我们对患有 EVD 的 SAH 患者使用依诺肝素进行预防性抗凝治疗时,常规监测其抗 Xa 时间。我们的主要研究目标是确定该人群中接受依诺肝素或未分级肝素(UFH)药物预防的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)和继发性颅内出血(ICH)的频率。
对 2012 年至 2017 年期间在埃默里大学医院神经重症监护病房住院的所有 SAH 患者进行了回顾性图表审查。所有需要 EVD 的 SAH 患者均被纳入研究。
在筛查的 1351 名患者中,868 名患者需要 EVD。在这 868 名患者中,627 名患者接受了依诺肝素治疗,114 名患者接受了 UFH 治疗,127 名患者未接受药物预防治疗。依诺肝素组患者的 VTE 发生率为 7.5%,UFH 组为 4.4%(p=0.32),无 VTE 预防组为 3.2%(p=0.08)。依诺肝素组患者的继发性 ICH 发生率为 3.83%,UFH 组为 3.51%(p=1),无 VTE 预防组为 3.94%(p=0.53)。当稳态抗 Xa 水平从 0.1 单位/ml 增加到>0.3 单位/ml 时,VTE 的发生率呈下降趋势。然而,并未发现抗 Xa 水平升高与继发性 ICH 发生率增加之间存在相关性。比较后发现,依诺肝素和 UFH 的使用与 VTE 或 ICH 的发生率降低均无显著相关性。
在这项对患有 EVD 的非创伤性 SAH 患者使用依诺肝素或 UFH 进行 VTE 预防或未进行 VTE 预防的回顾性研究中,VTE 或继发性 ICH 的发生率无统计学差异。对于接受预防性依诺肝素治疗的患者,达到较高的稳态目标抗 Xa 水平可能与降低 VTE 发生率相关,而不会增加继发性 ICH 的风险。