Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 1617 Riyue Avenue, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610073, China.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
BMC Womens Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03132-w.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures.
This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES.
Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis.
These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.
经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)是微创外科领域的一项成就。然而,阴道NOTES 在妇科手术中的优势尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较阴道NOTES 与经腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS),并确定哪种手术更适合妇科门诊手术。
这是一项在成都市妇女儿童中心医院妇科进行的回顾性观察性研究。207 名接受妇科NOTES 和 LESS 的患者于 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 3 月入组。收集接受门诊手术患者的手术相关信息,其中 64 例女性接受了阴道NOTES。
对 207 例患者的多项结果进行了分析。Wilcoxon 秩和检验显示,在术后疼痛评分(0 分与 1 分,p=0.026)、麻醉持续时间(90 分钟与 101 分钟,p=0.025)、手术时间(65 分钟与 80 分钟,p=0.015)、估计出血量(20 毫升与 40 毫升,p<0.001)和肠道衰竭时间(12.20 小时与 17.14 小时,p<0.001)方面,阴道NOTES 组与 LESS 组存在统计学差异。与 LESS 相比,阴道NOTES 不仅在手术时间和出血量方面具有优势,而且在预后质量方面也具有优势,能节省时间和出血量。
这些综合数据显示了阴道NOTES 提高手术效率的能力。阴道NOTES 在妇科手术中可能具有足够的可行性,并为妇科门诊手术提供了一种新的医疗策略,优于经腹腔镜单孔手术。