Suppr超能文献

子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗产后出血的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Hysterectomy in Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Fernandez Miguel Godeiro, Coutinho de Carvalho Sarah Fernandez, Martins Bruna Almeida, Santos Felipe da Silva Mota, Neto Fernando Antonio Falcão Paixão, Medeiros Malu Oliveira de Araujo, Bastos Metzger Patrick

机构信息

Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health (EBMSP), Salvador, Brazil.

University of Bahia State (UNEB), Salvador, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2024 May 11:15266028241252730. doi: 10.1177/15266028241252730.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus peripartum hysterectomy for acute refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched 6 medical databases for studies comparing UAE and hysterectomy in PPH. Outcomes examined were mortality, hospitalization duration (HD) in days, and red blood cells (RBC) units utilization. Statistical analysis used RevMan 5.1.7 and random-effects models. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 833 patients from 4 cohort studies, with 583 (70%) undergoing UAE. The UAE population required fewer RBC units (MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -14.73 to -0.04; p=0.05) and had shorter HD (MD: -3.22; 95% CI: -5.42 to -1.02; p=0.004). Lower mortality rates were noted for UAE in the pooled analysis, but no statistical significance. Uterine artery embolization demonstrated lower procedural complications (16.45% vs. 28.8%), in which UAE had less ureter and bladder lesions (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; p=0.004 and OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00-0.15; <0.001, respectively). Only 35 (6%) required conversion to hysterectomy, while 27 (4.6%) underwent re-embolization with 100% bleeding control. Uterine artery embolization did not hinder fertility, with normal menstruation restored in 19 patients with postoligomenorrhea.

CONCLUSION

Uterine artery embolization for the control of PPH is associated with lower use of RBC units and HD, but similar rates of mortality are noted when compared to hysterectomy. These results associated with uterine preservation could support its importance for refractory PPH management.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Uterine Artery Embolization is associated with a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced use of red blood cell units when compared with hysterectomy in refractory postpartum hemorrhage. Although demonstrating similar mortality rates, these findings, together with fertility preservation, support the method incorporation as a valuable option in obstetric services.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是进行一项荟萃分析,比较子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)与围产期子宫切除术在控制急性难治性产后出血(PPH)方面的有效性。

材料与方法

我们系统检索了6个医学数据库,以查找比较UAE和子宫切除术治疗PPH的研究。检查的结局指标包括死亡率、住院天数(HD)和红细胞(RBC)单位使用量。采用RevMan 5.1.7软件和随机效应模型进行统计分析。二分类和连续性结局分别采用比值比(OR)和均数差(MD)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

我们纳入了4项队列研究中的833例患者,其中583例(70%)接受了UAE。UAE组所需的RBC单位较少(MD:-7.39;95%CI:-14.73至-0.04;p=0.05),HD较短(MD:-3.22;95%CI:-5.42至-1.02;p=0.004)。汇总分析中UAE组的死亡率较低,但无统计学意义。子宫动脉栓塞术的手术并发症较低(16.45%对28.8%),其中UAE导致输尿管和膀胱损伤较少(OR:0.05;95%CI:0.01-0.38;p=0.004和OR:0.02;95%CI:0.00-0.15;p<0.001)。仅35例(6%)需要转为子宫切除术,27例(4.6%)接受了再次栓塞,出血控制率达100%。子宫动脉栓塞术不影响生育,19例月经过少的患者月经恢复正常。

结论

子宫动脉栓塞术用于控制PPH时,RBC单位使用量和HD较低,但与子宫切除术相比,死亡率相似。这些与保留子宫相关的结果支持了其在难治性PPH管理中的重要性。

临床意义

在难治性产后出血中,与子宫切除术相比,子宫动脉栓塞术的住院时间较短,红细胞单位使用量减少。尽管死亡率相似,但这些结果以及对生育功能的保留,支持将该方法纳入产科服务中作为一种有价值的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验