Suppr超能文献

一项随机个体内比较研究评估了两种超声辅助吸脂设备对腹部的影响。

A randomized intraindividual comparative study evaluating the effects of two ultrasound-assisted liposuction devices on the abdomen.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Research and Care of Burns, National Institute of Rehabilitation, Mexico City, Mexico.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Research and Care of Burns, National Institute of Rehabilitation, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jul;94:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.040. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) has become popular because of its favorable outcomes in fat emulsification, blood loss reduction, and skin tightening. This study aimed to compare the effects of two UAL devices on the abdomen by assessing postsurgery skin biomechanical properties.

METHODS

This single-blind, prospective study (2020-2022) involved 13 liposuction procedures performed on patients without chronic diseases. Each patient's abdomen was divided vertically from the xiphoid to the perineum. Vibration amplification of sound energy at resonance (VASER)-assisted liposuction (Solta Medical, Inc., Hayward, CA) was performed on one half, while the other half underwent liposuction with high-frequency ultrasound energy (HEUS)-assisted technology. Skin biomechanical measurements, including distensibility, net elasticity, biological elasticity, hydration, erythema, melanin, and skin firmness, were taken at 12 and 24 months postsurgery, focusing on the anterior abdomen, 8 cm to the right and left of the umbilicus.

RESULTS

Analysis of the above skin biomechanical measurements revealed no significant differences between the HEUS and VASER devices, except for skin firmness, which showed a notable increase following HEUS surgery. Patient-perceived clinical differences were assessed via nonvalidated questionnaires, revealing no distinctions between devices.

CONCLUSION

Biomechanical skin results post-UAL surgery with these devices on the abdomen were not significantly different, although HEUS revealed increased skin firmness. This suggests that HEUS-assisted technology, akin to other devices, is a viable option for UAL procedures.

摘要

背景

超声辅助吸脂术 (UAL) 因其在脂肪乳化、减少失血量和收紧皮肤方面的良好效果而受到青睐。本研究旨在通过评估术后皮肤生物力学特性来比较两种 UAL 设备对腹部的影响。

方法

这是一项单盲、前瞻性研究(2020-2022 年),涉及 13 例无慢性疾病的吸脂手术患者。每位患者的腹部从剑突垂直分为两半至会阴。一半行声能共振放大吸脂术 (Solta Medical, Inc., Hayward, CA),另一半行高频超声辅助技术吸脂术。术后 12 个月和 24 个月,分别测量腹部(肚脐右侧和左侧各 8cm 处)皮肤的生物力学特性,包括伸展性、净弹性、生物弹性、皮肤水分、红斑、黑色素和皮肤紧致度。

结果

除皮肤紧致度外,两种设备在皮肤生物力学测量方面没有显著差异,HEUS 手术后皮肤紧致度显著增加。通过非验证问卷评估患者对临床差异的感知,两种设备之间没有区别。

结论

尽管 HEUS 显示皮肤紧致度增加,但这些设备在腹部进行 UAL 手术后的皮肤生物力学结果没有显著差异。这表明 HEUS 辅助技术与其他设备一样,是 UAL 手术的可行选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验