Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Nov;100(5):849-856. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 9.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited data exist regarding the long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy (ET) with or without chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Our aim was to identify the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1b EAC and assess how the chosen treatment modality affects overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: We analyzed patients with histologically confirmed T1b EAC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Focusing on T1bN0M0 staging, the patients were divided into 2 groups (ET [n = 174] and surgery [n = 769]), and OS and CSS rates were calculated. RESULTS: Of 1418 patients with T1b EAC, 228 cases (16.1%) exhibited LNM at diagnosis. Notable risk factors for LNM included poorly differentiated tumor and lesion size ≥20 mm. For T1bN0M0 cases, ET was commonly performed from 2009 to 2018 (odds ratio [OR], 4.3), especially for patients aged ≥65 years (OR, 3.1) with tumor size <20 mm (OR, 2.3). During the median 50 months of follow-up, age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9), ET (HR, 1.5), and CRT (HR, 1.4) were associated with poorer OS. Factors linked to decreased CSS were age ≥65 years (subhazard ratio [SHR], 1.6), poorly differentiated tumors (SHR, 1.5), and CRT (SHR, 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: In T1b EAC, tumor size ≥20 mm and poor differentiation are notable risk factors for LNM. ET exhibited comparable CSS outcomes to surgery for carefully selected T1bN0M0 lesions. CRT did not provide additional survival benefit for these lesions; however, large-scale studies are required to validate this finding.
背景和目的:对于 T1b 期食管腺癌(EAC),内镜治疗(ET)联合或不联合放化疗(CRT)的长期疗效数据有限。本研究旨在确定 T1b 期 EAC 淋巴结转移(LNM)的危险因素,并评估所选治疗方式对总生存(OS)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)的影响。
方法:我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,分析了 2004 年至 2018 年间经组织学证实的 T1b 期 EAC 患者。聚焦 T1bN0M0 分期,将患者分为 ET 组(n=174)和手术组(n=769),并计算 OS 和 CSS 率。
结果:在 1418 例 T1b EAC 患者中,228 例(16.1%)在诊断时存在 LNM。LNM 的显著危险因素包括肿瘤分化差和病变大小≥20mm。对于 T1bN0M0 病例,ET 治疗主要在 2009 年至 2018 年进行(比值比 [OR],4.3),尤其是年龄≥65 岁(OR,3.1)和肿瘤大小<20mm(OR,2.3)的患者。在中位 50 个月的随访期间,年龄≥65 岁(风险比 [HR],1.9)、ET(HR,1.5)和 CRT(HR,1.4)与 OS 较差相关。与 CSS 降低相关的因素包括年龄≥65 岁(亚危险比 [SHR],1.6)、低分化肿瘤(SHR,1.5)和 CRT(SHR,1.5)。
结论:在 T1b 期 EAC 中,肿瘤大小≥20mm 和低分化是 LNM 的显著危险因素。对于精心选择的 T1bN0M0 病变,ET 与手术具有相当的 CSS 结果。对于这些病变,CRT 并未提供额外的生存获益,但需要更大规模的研究来验证这一发现。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017-11-16
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011-10-13
Dis Esophagus. 2024-6-1
Ann Surg. 2019-9
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015-6