Comparing clinical and aesthetic outcomes of cross-finger and homodigital reverse digital artery island flap for fingertip injuries: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND

Reverse homodigital artery island flap (RHDI) has been reported to have some postoperative complications. Cross-finger reverse digital artery island flap (CRDI), which is harvested from an adjacent intact finger, has been used to decrease these complications. This study aimed to provide a review of the CRDI procedure and compare the clinical outcomes of CRDI with those of RHDI.

METHODS

RHDI has been performed for fingertip amputations with deficit of 1.5-2.5 cm before 2018, and CRDI has been performed since 2018. We assessed the functional and aesthetic outcomes, including finger length, nail deformity, finger motion, and Hand20 scores at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 22 patients who underwent RHDI and 10 patients who underwent CRDI. The mean follow-up period was 10.3 ± 5.3 months. The median time required for wound healing were 47.0 days (IQR: 34.3-55.8 days) and 34.5 days (IQR: 29.3-44.3 days) in RHDI and CRDI, respectively. The hook nail deformity occurred significantly more frequently in RHDI compared to that in CRDI (40.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). Flexion contracture of the proximal interphalangeal joint greater than 15º was found to be significantly more in RHDI than in CRDI (36.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.04). The median postoperative total active motion of the donor site in CRDI was 278º (IQR: 260-280º). The median postoperative Hand20 scores were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

CRDI was associated with superior clinical outcomes in terms of lower rates of postoperative flexion contracture and hook nail deformity, potentially making it a better option compared to RHDI.