Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, Bloomberg Suite 6321, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 11;14(1):10790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61388-6.
In this two-center prospective cohort study of children on ECMO, we assessed a panel of plasma brain injury biomarkers using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to evaluate their interplay and association with outcomes. Biomarker concentrations were measured daily for the first 3 days of ECMO support in 95 participants. Unfavorable composite outcome was defined as in-hospital mortality or discharge Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category > 2 with decline ≥ 1 point from baseline. EFA grouped 11 biomarkers into three factors. Factor 1 comprised markers of cellular brain injury (NSE, BDNF, GFAP, S100β, MCP1, VILIP-1, neurogranin); Factor 2 comprised markers related to vascular processes (vWF, PDGFRβ, NPTX1); and Factor 3 comprised the BDNF/MMP-9 cellular pathway. Multivariable logistic models demonstrated that higher Factor 1 and 2 scores were associated with higher odds of unfavorable outcome (adjusted OR 2.88 [1.61, 5.66] and 1.89 [1.12, 3.43], respectively). Conversely, higher Factor 3 scores were associated with lower odds of unfavorable outcome (adjusted OR 0.54 [0.31, 0.88]), which is biologically plausible given the role of BDNF in neuroplasticity. Application of EFA on plasma brain injury biomarkers in children on ECMO yielded grouping of biomarkers into three factors that were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome, suggesting future potential as prognostic instruments.
在这项针对 ECMO 患儿的双中心前瞻性队列研究中,我们使用探索性因子分析(EFA)评估了一组血浆脑损伤生物标志物,以评估它们的相互作用及其与结局的关联。在 95 名参与者中,在 ECMO 支持的前 3 天每天测量生物标志物浓度。不良复合结局定义为住院死亡率或出院时小儿脑功能表现分类>2 分,且与基线相比下降≥1 分。EFA 将 11 种生物标志物分为 3 个因子。因子 1 包括细胞脑损伤标志物(NSE、BDNF、GFAP、S100β、MCP1、VILIP-1、神经颗粒素);因子 2 包括与血管过程相关的标志物(vWF、PDGFRβ、NPTX1);因子 3 包括 BDNF/MMP-9 细胞通路。多变量逻辑模型表明,较高的因子 1 和 2 评分与不良结局的可能性较高相关(调整后的比值比分别为 2.88 [1.61, 5.66] 和 1.89 [1.12, 3.43])。相反,较高的因子 3 评分与不良结局的可能性较低相关(调整后的比值比为 0.54 [0.31, 0.88]),这在生物学上是合理的,因为 BDNF 在神经可塑性中的作用。在 ECMO 患儿的血浆脑损伤生物标志物上应用 EFA 可将生物标志物分为与不良结局显著相关的 3 个因子,这表明其具有作为预后工具的未来潜力。