Department of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki City, Hyogo, Japan.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Nov;39(11):2807-2811. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.085. Epub 2024 May 11.
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are serious complications in hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The rates of intraoperative (iPFFs) and postoperative PFFs (pPFFs) are higher in cementless stem cases than in cemented cases. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cerclage cabling on PFF prevention in cementless arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
This retrospective study included 329 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroplasty using a cementless stem for femoral neck fractures. A total of 159 and 170 patients were in the non-cabling and cabling groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The PFF occurrence (iPFF and pPFF) rates, reoperation rates, operative time, and blood loss volume were compared between the groups.
The iPFF rate was significantly higher in the noncabling group (6.3%) than in the cabling group (0%, P < .001). The rate of pPFF was significantly higher in the non-cabling group (5.1%) than in the cabling group (0.6%; P = .016). All patients in the non-cabling group required reoperation (5.1%), whereas the patient in the cabling group was an ambulatory case and required no reoperation (0%, P = .003). No significant difference in either operative time or blood loss volume was observed between the non-cabling (50 minutes, 133 mL) and cabling (52 minutes, P = .244; 149 mL, P = .212, respectively) groups.
When a cementless stem is used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, cerclage cabling effectively prevents iPPF and pPPF without increasing surgical time or blood loss volume.
股骨假体周围骨折(PFF)是髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的严重并发症。非骨水泥型假体股骨颈骨折患者术中(iPFF)和术后 PFF(pPFF)的发生率高于骨水泥型假体。本研究旨在探讨环扎索带在股骨颈骨折非骨水泥假体中的应用对 PFF 预防的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入 329 例采用非骨水泥假体治疗股骨颈骨折的髋关节置换术患者。非环扎组和环扎组分别为 159 例和 170 例。两组患者的一般资料无显著差异。比较两组患者的 PFF 发生率(iPFF 和 pPFF)、再手术率、手术时间和失血量。
非环扎组 iPFF 发生率(6.3%)显著高于环扎组(0%,P<.001)。非环扎组 pPFF 发生率(5.1%)显著高于环扎组(0.6%,P=.016)。非环扎组所有患者均需再次手术(5.1%),而环扎组患者为门诊病例,无需再次手术(0%,P=.003)。非环扎组(50 分钟,133 毫升)和环扎组(52 分钟,P=.244;149 毫升,P=.212)的手术时间和失血量均无显著差异。
对于不稳定型股骨颈骨折,采用非骨水泥假体治疗时,环扎索带可有效预防 iPPF 和 pPPF,且不增加手术时间和失血量。