Suppr超能文献

奈玛特韦-利托那韦与莫努匹拉韦治疗晚期肾病患者新冠病毒感染的安全性和疗效比较:一项回顾性观察研究

Comparison of safety and efficacy between Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 infection in patients with advanced kidney disease: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Chu Wing Ming, Wan Eric Yuk Fai, Ting Wong Zoey Cho, Tam Anthony Raymond, Kei Wong Ian Chi, Yin Chan Esther Wai, Ngai Hung Ivan Fan

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 3;72:102620. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102620. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is used in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with normal or mild renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m). There is limited data regarding its use in advanced kidney disease (eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m). We performed a retrospective territory-wide observational study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir when compared with molnupiravir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 with advanced kidney disease.

METHODS

We adopted target trial emulation using data from a territory-wide electronic health record database on eligible patients aged ≥18 years with advanced kidney disease (history of eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m) who were infected with COVID-19 and were prescribed with either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within five days of infection during the period from 16 March 2022 to 31 December 2022. A sequence trial approach and 1:4 propensity score matching was applied based on the baseline covariates including age, sex, number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hospitalisation, eGFR, renal replacement therapy, comorbidities (cancer, respiratory disease, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, diabetes, hypertension), and drug use (renin-angiotensin-system agents, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, nitrates, lipid lowering agents, insulins, oral antidiabetic drugs, antiplatelets, immuno-suppressants, corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, histamine H receptor antagonists, monoclonal antibody infusion) within past 90 days. Individuals were followed up from the index date until the earliest outcome occurrence, death, 90 days from index date or the end of data availability. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted with baseline covariates was used to compare the risk of outcomes between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients and molnupiravir recipients which include (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) intensive care unit (ICU) admission, (iii) ventilatory support, (iv) hospitalisation, (v) hepatic impairment, (vi) ischaemic stroke, and (vii) myocardial infarction. Subgroup analyses included age (<70; ≥70 years); sex, Charlson comorbidity index (≤5; >5), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received (0-1; ≥2 doses).

FINDINGS

A total of 4886 patients were included (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 1462; molnupiravir: 3424). There were 347 events of all-cause mortality (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 74, 5.06%; molnupiravir: 273, 7.97%), 10 events of ICU admission (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 4, 0.27%; molnupiravir: 6, 0.18%), 48 events of ventilatory support (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 13, 0.89%; molnupiravir: 35, 1.02%), 836 events of hospitalisation (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 218, 23.98%; molnupiravir: 618, 28.14%), 1 event of hepatic impairment (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 0, 0%; molnupiravir: 1, 0.03%), 8 events of ischaemic stroke (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 3, 0.22%; molnupiravir: 5, 0.16%) and 9 events of myocardial infarction (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 2, 0.15%; molnupiravir: 7, 0.22%). Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir users had lower rates of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction (ARR) at 90 days 2.91%, 95% CI: 1.47-4.36%) and hospitalisation (ARR at 90 days 4.16%, 95% CI: 0.81-7.51%) as compared with molnupiravir users. Similar rates of ICU admission (ARR at 90 days -0.09%, 95% CI: -0.4 to 0.2%), ventilatory support (ARR at 90 days 0.13%, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.72%), hepatic impairment (ARR at 90 days 0.03%, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.09%), ischaemic stroke (ARR at 90 days -0.06%, 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.22%), and myocardial infarction (ARR at 90 days 0.07%, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.33%) were found between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir users. Consistent results were observed in relative risk adjusted with baseline characteristics. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.455-0.857) and hospitalisation (HR: 0.782, 95% CI: 0.64-0.954).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with COVID-19 with advanced kidney disease receiving nirmatrelvir-ritonavir had a lower rate of all-cause mortality and hospital admission when compared with molnupiravir. Other adverse clinical outcomes were similar in both treatment groups.

FUNDING

Health and Medical Research Fund (COVID1903010), Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

摘要

背景

奈玛特韦-利托那韦用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)且肾功能正常或轻度受损(估算肾小球滤过率[eGFR]≥30 ml/(min·1.73 m²))的患者。关于其在晚期肾病(eGFR<30 ml/(min·1.73 m²))患者中的应用数据有限。我们开展了一项全地区回顾性观察性研究,比较了奈玛特韦-利托那韦与莫努匹拉韦治疗晚期肾病COVID-19患者的安全性和疗效。

方法

我们采用目标试验模拟方法,利用全地区电子健康记录数据库中符合条件的患者数据,这些患者年龄≥18岁,患有晚期肾病(eGFR病史<30 ml/(min·1.73 m²)),感染了COVID-19,并在2022年3月16日至2022年12月31日期间感染后5天内被开具莫努匹拉韦或奈玛特韦-利托那韦。基于年龄、性别、接种COVID-19疫苗的剂量数、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)、住院情况、eGFR、肾脏替代治疗、合并症(癌症、呼吸系统疾病、心肌梗死、缺血性中风、糖尿病、高血压)以及过去90天内的药物使用情况(肾素-血管紧张素系统药物、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂、利尿剂、硝酸盐、降脂药物、胰岛素、口服降糖药、抗血小板药物、免疫抑制剂、皮质类固醇、质子泵抑制剂、组胺H受体拮抗剂、单克隆抗体输注)等基线协变量,应用序贯试验方法和1:4倾向评分匹配。从索引日期开始对个体进行随访,直至最早出现结局、死亡、索引日期后90天或数据可用期结束。使用经基线协变量调整的分层Cox比例风险回归,比较奈玛特韦-利托那韦接受者和莫努匹拉韦接受者之间的结局风险,这些结局包括:(i)全因死亡率,(ii)重症监护病房(ICU)入院,(iii)通气支持,(iv)住院,(v)肝损伤,(vi)缺血性中风,以及(vii)心肌梗死。亚组分析包括年龄(<70岁;≥70岁)、性别、查尔森合并症指数(≤5;>5)以及接种COVID-19疫苗的剂量数(0 - 1剂;≥2剂)。

结果

共纳入4886例患者(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:1462例;莫努匹拉韦组:3424例)。发生全因死亡事件347例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:74例,5.06%;莫努匹拉韦组:273例,7.97%),ICU入院事件10例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:4例,0.27%;莫努匹拉韦组:6例,0.18%),通气支持事件48例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:13例,0.89%;莫努匹拉韦组:35例,1.02%),住院事件836例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:218例,23.98%;莫努匹拉韦组:618例,28.14%),肝损伤事件1例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:0例;莫努匹拉韦组:1例,0.03%),缺血性中风事件8例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:3例,0.22%;莫努匹拉韦组:5例,0.16%),心肌梗死事件9例(奈玛特韦-利托那韦组:2例,0.15%;莫努匹拉韦组:7例,0.22%)。与莫努匹拉韦使用者相比,奈玛特韦-利托那韦使用者的全因死亡率(90天时绝对风险降低(ARR)2.91%,95%置信区间:1.47 - 4.36%)和住院率(90天时ARR 4.17%,95%置信区间:0.81 - 7.51%)较低。奈玛特韦-利托那韦使用者和莫努匹拉韦使用者在ICU入院(90天时ARR -0.09%,95%置信区间:-0.4至0.2%)、通气支持(90天时ARR 0.13%,95%置信区间:-0.45至0.72%)、肝损伤(90天时ARR 0.03%,95%置信区间:-0.03至0.09%)、缺血性中风(90天时ARR -0.06%,95%置信区间:-0.35至0.22%)和心肌梗死(90天时ARR 0.07%,95%置信区间:-0.19至0.33%)方面的发生率相似。在根据基线特征调整相对风险后观察到一致的结果。奈玛特韦-利托那韦与全因死亡率(风险比[HR]:0.624,95%置信区间:0.455 - 0.857)和住院风险(HR:0.782,95%置信区间:0.64 - 0.954)显著降低相关。

解读

与莫努匹拉韦相比,接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的晚期肾病COVID-19患者的全因死亡率和住院率较低。两个治疗组的其他不良临床结局相似。

资助

中国香港特别行政区政府卫生署健康及医学研究基金(COVID1903010)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac16/11087721/b80b3adf3661/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验