Beckham Thomas H, Rooney Michael K, McAleer Mary F, Ghia Amol J, Tom Martin C, Perni Subha, McGovern Susan, Grosshans David, Chung Caroline, Wang Chenyang, De Brain, Swanson Todd, Paulino Arnold, Jiang Wen, Ferguson Sherise, Patel Chirag B, Li Jing, Yeboa Debra N
Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Jan 18;11(3):266-274. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae004. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Glioblastoma (GBM) poses therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature, particularly for patients with poor functional status and/or advanced disease. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) regimens have demonstrated comparable disease outcomes for this population while allowing treatment to be completed more quickly. Here, we report our institutional outcomes of patients treated with 2 hypofractionated RT regimens: 40 Gy/15fx (3w-RT) and 50 Gy/20fx (4w-RT).
A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted of 127 GBM patients who underwent 3w-RT or 4w-RT. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact of chemotherapy and RT schedule was explored through subgroup analyses.
Median OS for the entire cohort was 7.7 months. There were no significant differences in PFS or OS between 3w-RT and 4w-RT groups overall. Receipt and timing of temozolomide (TMZ) emerged as the variable most strongly associated with survival, with patients receiving adjuvant-only or concurrent and adjuvant TMZ having significantly improved PFS and OS ( < .001). In a subgroup analysis of patients that did not receive TMZ, patients in the 4w-RT group demonstrated a trend toward improved OS as compared to the 3w-RT group ( = .12).
This study demonstrates comparable survival outcomes between 3w-RT and 4w-RT regimens in GBM patients. Receipt and timing of TMZ were strongly associated with survival outcomes. The potential benefit of dose-escalated hypofractionation for patients not receiving chemotherapy warrants further investigation and emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment approaches.
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)因其侵袭性本质而带来治疗挑战,对于功能状态差和/或疾病晚期的患者尤其如此。大分割放疗(RT)方案已证明对该人群有可比的疾病治疗效果,同时能使治疗更快完成。在此,我们报告接受两种大分割RT方案治疗的患者在本机构的治疗结果:40 Gy/15次分割(3周RT)和50 Gy/20次分割(4周RT)。
对127例接受3周RT或4周RT的GBM患者进行单机构回顾性分析。分析患者特征、治疗方案和治疗结果。使用单变量和多变量Cox回归模型估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。通过亚组分析探讨化疗和RT方案的影响。
整个队列的中位OS为7.7个月。总体而言,3周RT组和4周RT组之间的PFS或OS无显著差异。替莫唑胺(TMZ)的使用和时间是与生存最密切相关的变量,接受单纯辅助或同步加辅助TMZ治疗的患者PFS和OS显著改善(P <.001)。在未接受TMZ治疗的患者亚组分析中,4周RT组患者与3周RT组相比显示出OS改善的趋势(P =.12)。
本研究表明GBM患者中3周RT和4周RT方案的生存结果相当。TMZ的使用和时间与生存结果密切相关。对于未接受化疗的患者,剂量递增大分割放疗的潜在益处值得进一步研究,并强调了个性化治疗方法的重要性。