• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威版《长处和困难问卷》在学龄前儿童样本中的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a preschool sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;78(6):482-488. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2351046. Epub 2024 May 13.

DOI:10.1080/08039488.2024.2351046
PMID:38739484
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used internationally, however less so in preschool populations and validations studies are thus needed. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version parent report of the SDQ - preschool version (SDQ 2-4).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parents of 289 Norwegian children in the age span 1-6 years old filled out the SDQ 2-4, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and background information. Internal consistency, factor structure, and convergent validity were assessed.

RESULTS

The results showed satisfying internal consistency for the total difficulties score, but worse for some of the subscales. The five-factor structure showed a good fit. Good convergent and divergent validity was found in terms of correlations with CBCL. Sex differences were found on all scales, boys scoring higher on all problem scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The SDQ 2-4 can be a promising instrument to screen for emotional and behavioral difficulties among Norwegian preschoolers, particularly in high-risk populations.

摘要

目的

《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)在国际上被广泛使用,但在学龄前人群中的使用较少,因此需要进行验证研究。本研究旨在检验挪威版家长报告的 SDQ-学龄前版(SDQ 2-4)的心理测量特性。

材料和方法

289 名年龄在 1-6 岁的挪威儿童的家长填写了 SDQ 2-4、《儿童行为检查表》(CBCL)和背景信息。评估了内部一致性、因子结构和聚合效度。

结果

结果显示,总困难得分的内部一致性令人满意,但一些分量表的内部一致性较差。五因素结构具有良好的拟合度。与 CBCL 的相关性表明具有良好的聚合和发散效度。在所有量表上都发现了性别差异,男孩在所有问题量表上的得分都较高。

结论

SDQ 2-4 可作为一种有前途的工具,用于筛查挪威学龄前儿童的情绪和行为困难,特别是在高风险人群中。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a preschool sample.挪威版《长处和困难问卷》在学龄前儿童样本中的心理测量特性。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;78(6):482-488. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2351046. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Incremental validity of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Vietnam.越南儿童行为检查表(CBCL)和长处与困难问卷(SDQ)的增量有效性。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Oct;29:96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Self-Report: A Valid Instrument for the Identification of Emotional and Behavioral Problems.长处与困难问卷(自我报告版):一种有效识别情绪和行为问题的工具。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 May-Jun;19(4):471-476. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
5
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.荷兰版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)- 家长用 2-18 岁儿童版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1.
6
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire self-report-, parent-, and teacher version in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.《智力和发育障碍儿童的长处和困难问卷(自我报告版、家长版和教师版)》。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Apr;123:104194. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104194. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Characteristics of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in preschool children.学前儿童长处和困难问卷的特点。
Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e446-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0089. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
8
The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: validation study in French school-aged children and cross-cultural comparisons.长处与困难问卷:针对法国学龄儿童的效度研究及跨文化比较
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):740-7. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0489-8. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
9
[Screening childhood behavior problems using short questionnaires I.: the Hungarian version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire].[使用简短问卷筛查儿童行为问题I:优势与困难问卷的匈牙利语版本]
Psychiatr Hung. 2008;23(5):358-65.
10
Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(3-4) in 3-year-old preschoolers.3-4 岁学龄前儿童长处和困难问卷(SDQ)的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;54(3):282-91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a universal home-based, multi-component intervention to promote healthy weight development in children during infancy and toddlerhood in denmark: the bloom study.丹麦一项关于在婴儿期和幼儿期促进儿童健康体重发展的基于家庭的多成分通用干预措施的整群随机对照试验的研究方案:绽放研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):2952. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24352-1.
2
Correlation Study Between Dietary Behaviors, Lifestyle, and Psychological Problems in Chinese Children Aged 3-7.中国3至7岁儿童饮食行为、生活方式与心理问题的相关性研究
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 2;17(1):176. doi: 10.3390/nu17010176.