• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

6分钟钉板和套环试验对乳腺癌患者功能锻炼能力的可靠性和有效性

Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.

作者信息

Oncu Hacer, Calik-Kutukcu Ebru, Vardar Yagli Naciye, Inal-Ince Deniz, Saglam Melda, Unal Ferhat, Aksoy Sercan

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Data Management Unit, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Mar;41(3):643-655. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260. Epub 2024 May 13.

DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260
PMID:38739486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain, sensory disturbances, and lymphedema are frequent after breast cancer, leading to arm dysfunction. There is a need for objective performance-based clinical exercise tests for the upper extremity in patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Forty-eight women with breast cancer (mean age = 55.40 ± 10.40 years) were included. All patients performed 6PBRT on the first day and one week later to investigate the test-retest reliability of the 6PBRT, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. The peak workload (W) and oxygen consumption level (VO) during the arm ergometer test were used as outcomes for the criterion validity of the 6PBRT.

RESULTS

The 6PBRT showed good test - retest reliability with an ICC value of 0.871 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.769-0.928]. The first 6PBRT score was very strongly correlated with the second test score ( = 0.866,  < .001). The 6PBRT score was significantly correlated with VO ( = 0.634,  < .001), and W ( = 0.546,  < .001). While the 6PBRT score had less effect on VO, the determination of VO in the model was very good (R = 0.832).

CONCLUSION

The 6PBRT has good test-retest reliability and is a valid test in individuals with breast cancer. These findings suggest that 6PBRT is a practical, useful, valid and reliable assessment tool for determining functional arm exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌后慢性疼痛、感觉障碍和淋巴水肿很常见,会导致手臂功能障碍。乳腺癌患者需要基于客观表现的上肢临床运动测试。

目的

本研究旨在评估乳腺癌幸存者中6分钟钉板和指环测试(6PBRT)的有效性和可靠性。

方法

纳入48名乳腺癌女性(平均年龄=55.40±10.40岁)。所有患者在第一天和一周后进行6PBRT,以研究6PBRT的重测可靠性,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)。手臂测力计测试期间的峰值工作量(W)和耗氧量水平(VO)用作6PBRT标准效度的结果。

结果

6PBRT显示出良好的重测可靠性,ICC值为0.871[95%置信区间(CI)0.769-0.928]。第一次6PBRT评分与第二次测试评分高度相关(=0.866,<0.001)。6PBRT评分与VO(=0.634,<0.001)和W(=0.546,<0.001)显著相关。虽然6PBRT评分对VO的影响较小,但模型中VO的测定效果很好(R=0.832)。

结论

6PBRT具有良好的重测可靠性,对乳腺癌患者是一项有效的测试。这些发现表明,6PBRT是一种实用、有用、有效且可靠的评估工具,可用于确定乳腺癌患者的手臂功能运动能力。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.6分钟钉板和套环试验对乳腺癌患者功能锻炼能力的可靠性和有效性
Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Mar;41(3):643-655. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Validity and reliability of the Six-Minute Pegboard Ring Test for assessing functional capacity and upper limb function in persons with multiple sclerosis.六分钟指孔插板测试评估多发性硬化症患者功能能力和上肢功能的有效性和可靠性。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Oct;90:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105836. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Validity and reliability of an immersive virtual reality adaptation of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test.6分钟钉板和套环测试的沉浸式虚拟现实改编版的效度和信度。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2025 Feb;44(1):101981. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101981. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
4
Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthma.6 分钟指板和指环测试在哮喘患者中的有效性和可靠性。
J Asthma. 2022 Jul;59(7):1387-1395. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1930040. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
Test-retest reliability of the unsupported upper-limb exercise test (UULEX) and 6-min peg board ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adult individuals.健康成年个体中无支撑上肢运动测试(UULEX)和6分钟钉板套环测试(6PBRT)的重测信度。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Oct;34(10):806-812. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1425786. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
6
Validity and Reliability of the 6-min Pegboard and Ring Test in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.6分钟钉板和套环试验在杜氏肌营养不良症患者中的有效性和可靠性
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Feb;71(2):200-207. doi: 10.1002/mus.28314. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
7
Cardiorespiratory and metabolic demand of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test in healthy young adults.健康年轻成年人使用 6 分钟指板和环测试的心肺和代谢需求。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jan;29:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
The 6-minute pegboard and ring test is correlated with upper extremity activity of daily living in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.6 分钟指板和指环测试与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者上肢日常活动能力相关。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:347-51. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S45081. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
9
Convergent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Unsupported Upper Limb Exercise Test in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain.慢性颈痛患者非支撑上肢运动试验的会聚有效性和重测信度。
Percept Mot Skills. 2022 Aug;129(4):1177-1192. doi: 10.1177/00315125221096400. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
10
Validity and reliability of the unsupported upper-limb exercise test in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.未支撑上肢运动试验在类风湿关节炎患者中的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;22(11):2025-2030. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13720. Epub 2019 Oct 9.