University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Healthc Manage Forum. 2024 Sep;37(5):340-350. doi: 10.1177/08404704241248559. Epub 2024 May 13.
Healthcare delivery systems in Canada are structured using three models: individual institutions, health regions, and single provincial systems, usually with smaller geographic zones. The comparative ability of these models to improve care, outcomes, and the Quadruple Aim is largely unstudied. We reviewed Canadian studies examining outcomes of provincial healthcare delivery system restructuring. Across models, results were inconsistent, and quality of evidence was low. For all provinces, primary care sits outside healthcare delivery systems, with limited governance and integration. The single provincial model can reduce costs of non-clinical support functions like finance, human resources, and analytics. This model may also be best at reducing variations in care, improving electronic information integration that enables clinical decision support and reporting, and supporting the provincial spread and scale of innovations, but further refinements are required and existing studies have major limitations, limiting definitive conclusions.
个体机构、卫生区域和单一省级系统,通常还有更小的地理区域。这些模式在改善护理、结果和四重目标方面的比较能力在很大程度上尚未得到研究。我们回顾了加拿大研究省级医疗保健提供系统结构调整结果的研究。在所有模式中,结果不一致,证据质量较低。对于所有省份,初级保健都处于医疗保健提供系统之外,治理和整合程度有限。单一省级模式可以降低非临床支持功能(如财务、人力资源和分析)的成本。这种模式也可能最能减少护理差异,改善电子信息集成,从而支持临床决策支持和报告,并支持省级创新的传播和规模,但需要进一步改进,而且现有研究存在重大局限性,限制了明确的结论。